Tuhin Sahai

dblp:18/7588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1896-8768ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Motion planning and robot control · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Quantum computing and quantum information · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control
0.912025
Optimal Control for Transformer Architectures: Enhancing Generalization, Robustness and Efficiency · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
robust generalization
0.912025
Optimal Control for Transformer Architectures: Enhancing Generalization, Robustness and Efficiency · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
Optimal Control for Transformer Architectures: Enhancing Generalization, Robustness and Efficiency · NeurIPS 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
model counting
0.412020
Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms · AAAI 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computational models
quantum annealing
0.412020
Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal control theory · 0.9continuous-time formulation · 0.9quantum annealing · 0.4concentration of measure · 0.4SMT solvers · 0.4QUBO · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimal Control for Transformer Architectures: Enhancing Generalization, Robustness and Efficiency
abstract
We study Transformers through the perspective of optimal control theory, using tools from continuous-time formulations to derive actionable insights into training and architecture design. This framework improves the performance of existing Transformer models while providing desirable theoretical guarantees, including generalization and robustness. Our framework is designed to be plug-and-play, enabling seamless integration with established Transformer models and requiring only slight changes to the implementation. We conduct seven extensive experiments on tasks motivated by text generation, sentiment analysis, image classification, and point cloud classification. Experimental results show that the framework improves the test performance of the baselines, while being more parameter-efficient. On character-level text generation with nanoGPT, our framework achieves a 46\% reduction in final test loss while using 42\% fewer parameters. On GPT-2, our framework achieves a 9.3\% reduction in final test loss, demonstrating scalability to larger models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that applies optimal control theory to both the training and architecture of Transformers. It offers a new foundation for systematic, theory-driven improvements and moves beyond costly trial-and-error approaches.
Kelvin Kan, Xingjian Li 0005, Benjamin J. Zhang, Tuhin Sahai, Stanley J. Osher, Markos A. Katsoulakis
NeurIPS4
2020 Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms
abstract
Given a Boolean formula ϕ(x) in conjunctive normal form (CNF), the density of states counts the number of variable assignments that violate exactly e clauses, for all values of e. Thus, the density of states is a histogram of the number of unsatisfied clauses over all possible assignments. This computation generalizes both maximum-satisfiability (MAX-SAT) and model counting problems and not only provides insight into the entire solution space, but also yields a measure for the hardness of the problem instance. Consequently, in real-world scenarios, this problem is typically infeasible even when using state-of-the-art algorithms. While finding an exact answer to this problem is a computationally intensive task, we propose a novel approach for estimating density of states based on the concentration of measure inequalities. The methodology results in a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO), which is particularly amenable to quantum annealing-based solutions. We present the overall approach and compare results from the D-Wave quantum annealer against the best-known classical algorithms such as the Hamze-de Freitas-Selby (HFS) algorithm and satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) solvers.
Tuhin Sahai, Jose Miguel Pasini, Susmit Jha
AAAI1
2019 TeLEx: learning signal temporal logic from positive examples using tightness metric
Susmit Jha, Ashish Tiwari 0001, Sanjit A. Seshia, Tuhin Sahai, Natarajan Shankar
Formal Methods Syst. Des.4
2019 Explaining AI Decisions Using Efficient Methods for Learning Sparse Boolean Formulae
Susmit Jha, Tuhin Sahai, Vasumathi Raman, Alessandro Pinto, Michael Francis
J. Autom. Reason.2
2017 TeLEx: Passive STL Learning Using Only Positive Examples
Susmit Jha, Ashish Tiwari 0001, Sanjit A. Seshia, Tuhin Sahai, Natarajan Shankar
RV4