Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Tielmann

dblp:18/992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics
clinical data management
0.412019
Presenting and sharing clinical data using the eTRIKS Standards Master Tree for tranSMART · Bioinform. 2019
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics
clinical data integration
0.112019
Presenting and sharing clinical data using the eTRIKS Standards Master Tree for tranSMART · Bioinform. 2019
Distributed computing theory
adversarial models
0.112009
The disagreement power of an adversary: extended abstract · PODC 2009
Distributed computing theory › fault tolerance
crash failures
0.112009
The disagreement power of an adversary: extended abstract · PODC 2009
Distributed computing theory
shared memory
0.112009
The disagreement power of an adversary: extended abstract · PODC 2009
Distributed computing theory
consensus
0.012009
The disagreement power of an adversary: extended abstract · PODC 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ETL · 0.4CDISC SDTM · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Presenting and sharing clinical data using the eTRIKS Standards Master Tree for tranSMART
abstract
MOTIVATION: Standardization and semantic alignment have been considered one of the major challenges for data integration in clinical research. The inclusion of the CDISC SDTM clinical data standard into the tranSMART i2b2 via a guiding master ontology tree positively impacts and supports the efficacy of data sharing, visualization and exploration across datasets. RESULTS: We present here a schema for the organization of SDTM variables into the tranSMART i2b2 tree along with a script and test dataset to exemplify the mapping strategy. The eTRIKS master tree concept is demonstrated by making use of fictitious data generated for four patients, including 16 SDTM clinical domains. We describe how the usage of correct visit names and data labels can help to integrate multiple readouts per patient and avoid ETL crashes when running a tranSMART loading routine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The eTRIKS Master Tree package and test datasets are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009098 and a functional demo installation at https://public.etriks.org/transmart/datasetExplorer/ under eTRIKS-Master Tree branch, where the discussed examples can be visualized.
Adriano Barbosa-Silva, Dorina Bratfalean, Venkata P. Satagopam, Paul Houston, Lauren B. Becnel, Serge Eifes, Fabien Richard, Andreas Tielmann, Sascha Herzinger, Kavita Rege, Rudi Balling, Paul Peeters
Bioinform.9
2011 The disagreement power of an adversary
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Rachid Guerraoui, Andreas Tielmann
Distributed Comput.4
2009 Fault-Tolerant Consensus in Unknown and Anonymous Networks
abstract
This paper investigates under which conditions information can be reliably shared and consensus can be solved in unknown and anonymous message-passing networks that suffer from crash-failures. We provide algorithms to emulate registers and solve consensus under different synchrony assumptions. For this, we introduce a novel pseudo leader-election approach which allows a leader-based consensus implementation without breaking symmetry.
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Andreas Tielmann
ICDCS3
2009 Message-efficient omission-tolerant consensus with limited synchrony
abstract
We study the problem of consensus in the general omission failure model, i.e., in systems where processes can crash and omit messages while sending or receiving. This failure model is motivated from a smart card-based security framework in which certain security problems can be reduced to consensus in that model. We propose an algorithm that solves consensus based on very weak timing assumptions. More precisely, we show that consensus is solvable using an eventual bisource and a majority of fault-free processes. An eventual bisource is a fault-free process that can eventually communicate with all other processes in a timely manner. In contrast to previous work, we use timing assumptions directly in the algorithm and do not employ the notion of a failure detector. We argue that this is helpful in reducing the message complexity, a critical aspect of algorithms which run on smart cards.
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Andreas Tielmann, Felix C. Freiling, Mahir Kilic
IPDPS3
2009 The disagreement power of an adversary: extended abstract
abstract
At the heart of distributed computing lies the fundamental result that the level of agreement that can be obtained in an asynchronous shared memory model where t processes can crash is exactly t+1. In other words, an adversary that can crash any subset of size at most t can prevent the processes from agreeing on t values. But what about the rest (22n − n) adversaries that might crash certain combination of processes and not others?
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Rachid Guerraoui, Andreas Tielmann
PODC4
2009 The Disagreement Power of an Adversary
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Rachid Guerraoui, Andreas Tielmann
DISC4
2008 The Weakest Failure Detector for Message Passing Set-Agreement
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Rachid Guerraoui, Andreas Tielmann
DISC4
2007 From Crash-Stop to Permanent Omission: Automatic Transformation and Weakest Failure Detectors
Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Felix C. Freiling, Lucia Draque Penso, Andreas Tielmann
DISC5