Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yannick Schroecker

dblp:180/1434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Reinforcement learning · 69% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
1.442019
Active Learning within Constrained Environments through Imitation of an Expert Questioner · IJCAI 2019
Imitating Latent Policies from Observation · ICML 2019
Generative predecessor models for sample-efficient imitation learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
in-context reinforcement learning
1.322023
Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
1.222023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Bootstrapped Meta-Learning · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.822023
Bootstrapped Meta-Learning · ICLR 2022
Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
diversity optimization
0.712023
Discovering Policies with DOMiNO: Diversity Optimization Maintaining Near Optimality · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning theory
near-optimal policy identification
0.712023
Discovering Policies with DOMiNO: Diversity Optimization Maintaining Near Optimality · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy diversity
0.712023
Discovering Policies with DOMiNO: Diversity Optimization Maintaining Near Optimality · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model
0.712023
Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › state space model
structured state space model
0.712023
Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.412019
Active Learning within Constrained Environments through Imitation of an Expert Questioner · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
sample-efficient imitation learning
0.412019
Generative predecessor models for sample-efficient imitation learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.212023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.212023
Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.112017
State Aware Imitation Learning · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence modeling · 0.7parallel training · 0.7large-scale training · 0.7diversity optimization · 0.7constrained optimization · 0.7automated curriculum · 0.7attention-based memory · 0.7meta-learning · 0.6bootstrapping · 0.6generative modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Discovering Policies with DOMiNO: Diversity Optimization Maintaining Near Optimality
Tom Zahavy, Yannick Schroecker, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Kate Baumli, Sebastian Flennerhag, Shaobo Hou, Satinder Singh 0001
ICLR2
2023 Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space
abstract
Foundation models have shown impressive adaptation and scalability in supervised and self-supervised learning problems, but so far these successes have not fully translated to reinforcement learning (RL). In this work, we demonstrate that training an RL agent at scale leads to a general in-context learning algorithm that can adapt to open-ended novel embodied 3D problems as quickly as humans. In a vast space of held-out environment dynamics, our adaptive agent (AdA) displays on-the-fly hypothesis-driven exploration, efficient exploitation of acquired knowledge, and can successfully be prompted with first-person demonstrations. Adaptation emerges from three ingredients: (1) meta-reinforcement learning across a vast, smooth and diverse task distribution, (2) a policy parameterised as a large-scale attention-based memory architecture, and (3) an effective automated curriculum that prioritises tasks at the frontier of an agent’s capabilities. We demonstrate characteristic scaling laws with respect to network size, memory length, and richness of the training task distribution. We believe our results lay the foundation for increasingly general and adaptive RL agents that perform well across ever-larger open-ended domains.
Jakob Bauer, Kate Baumli, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Avishkar Bhoopchand, Nathalie Bradley-Schmieg, Natalie Clay, Adrian Collister, Vibhavari Dasagi, Lucy Gonzalez, Karol Gregor, Edward Hughes 0001, Sheleem Kashem, Maria Loks-Thompson, Hannah Openshaw, Jack Parker-Holder, Shreya Pathak, Nicolas Perez Nieves, Nemanja Rakicevic, Tim Rocktäschel, Yannick Schroecker, Satinder Singh 0001, Jakub Sygnowski, Karl Tuyls, Sarah York, Alexander Zacherl, Lei M. Zhang
ICML21
2023 Structured State Space Models for In-Context Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Structured state space sequence (S4) models have recently achieved state-of-the-art performance on long-range sequence modeling tasks. These models also have fast inference speeds and parallelisable training, making them potentially useful in many reinforcement learning settings. We propose a modification to a variant of S4 that enables us to initialise and reset the hidden state in parallel, allowing us to tackle reinforcement learning tasks. We show that our modified architecture runs asymptotically faster than Transformers in sequence length and performs better than RNN's on a simple memory-based task. We evaluate our modified architecture on a set of partially-observable environments and find that, in practice, our model outperforms RNN's while also running over five times faster. Then, by leveraging the model’s ability to handle long-range sequences, we achieve strong performance on a challenging meta-learning task in which the agent is given a randomly-sampled continuous control environment, combined with a randomly-sampled linear projection of the environment's observations and actions. Furthermore, we show the resulting model can adapt to out-of-distribution held-out tasks. Overall, the results presented in this paper show that structured state space models are fast and performant for in-context reinforcement learning tasks. We provide code at https://github.com/luchris429/s5rl.
Chris Lu 0001, Yannick Schroecker, Albert Gu, Emilio Parisotto, Jakob N. Foerster, Satinder Singh 0001, Feryal M. P. Behbahani
NeurIPS2
2022 Bootstrapped Meta-Learning
Sebastian Flennerhag, Yannick Schroecker, Tom Zahavy, Hado van Hasselt, David Silver 0001, Satinder Singh 0001
ICLR2
2019 Generative predecessor models for sample-efficient imitation learning
Yannick Schroecker, Mel Vecerík, Jonathan Scholz
ICLR (Poster)1
2019 Imitating Latent Policies from Observation
abstract
In this paper, we describe a novel approach to imitation learning that infers latent policies directly from state observations. We introduce a method that characterizes the causal effects of latent actions on observations while simultaneously predicting their likelihood. We then outline an action alignment procedure that leverages a small amount of environment interactions to determine a mapping between the latent and real-world actions. We show that this corrected labeling can be used for imitating the observed behavior, even though no expert actions are given. We evaluate our approach within classic control environments and a platform game and demonstrate that it performs better than standard approaches. Code for this work is available at https://github.com/ashedwards/ILPO.
Ashley D. Edwards, Himanshu Sahni, Yannick Schroecker, Charles L. Isbell Jr.
ICML3
2019 Active Learning within Constrained Environments through Imitation of an Expert Questioner
abstract
Active learning agents typically employ a query selection algorithm which solely considers the agent's learning objectives. However, this may be insufficient in more realistic human domains. This work uses imitation learning to enable an agent in a constrained environment to concurrently reason about both its internal learning goals and environmental constraints externally imposed, all within its objective function. Experiments are conducted on a concept learning task to test generalization of the proposed algorithm to different environmental conditions and analyze how time and resource constraints impact efficacy of solving the learning problem. Our findings show the environmentally-aware learning agent is able to statistically outperform all other active learners explored under most of the constrained conditions. A key implication is adaptation for active learning agents to more realistic human environments, where constraints are often externally imposed on the learner.
Kalesha Bullard, Yannick Schroecker, Sonia Chernova
IJCAI2
2017 State Aware Imitation Learning
abstract
Imitation learning is the study of learning how to act given a set of demonstrations provided by a human expert. It is intuitively apparent that learning to take optimal actions is a simpler undertaking in situations that are similar to the ones shown by the teacher. However, imitation learning approaches do not tend to use this insight directly. In this paper, we introduce State Aware Imitation Learning (SAIL), an imitation learning algorithm that allows an agent to learn how to remain in states where it can confidently take the correct action and how to recover if it is lead astray. Key to this algorithm is a gradient learned using a temporal difference update rule which leads the agent to prefer states similar to the demonstrated states. We show that estimating a linear approximation of this gradient yields similar theoretical guarantees to online temporal difference learning approaches and empirically show that SAIL can effectively be used for imitation learning in continuous domains with non-linear function approximators used for both the policy representation and the gradient estimate.
Yannick Schroecker, Charles L. Isbell Jr.
NIPS1