Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lucas Lersch

dblp:180/3171 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 31% Storage systems · 26% Cloud and datacenter computing · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Indexing and storage engines · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
persistent memory index
0.822020
PiBench Online: Interactive Benchmarking of Persistent Memory Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.522020
PiBench Online: Interactive Benchmarking of Persistent Memory Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Storage systems
key-value storage
0.412020
Enabling Low Tail Latency on Multicore Key-Value Stores · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › quality of service
tail latency
0.412020
Enabling Low Tail Latency on Multicore Key-Value Stores · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Indexing and storage engines
range index
0.412019
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Memory systems
non-volatile memory
0.222020
PiBench Online: Interactive Benchmarking of Persistent Memory Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Storage systems › file systems › write-optimized file system
log-structured file system
0.112020
Enabling Low Tail Latency on Multicore Key-Value Stores · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › database system benchmarking
index benchmarking
0.112019
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Memory systems › non-volatile memory
persistent memory
0.112019
Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardware performance counters · 0.9message-passing communication · 0.4asynchronous programming model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Five-Minute Rule for the Cloud: Caching in Analytics Systems
Kira Duwe, Angelos-Christos G. Anadiotis, Andrew Lamb, Lucas Lersch, Boaz Leskes, Daniel Ritter 0001, Pinar Tözün
CIDR4
2020 PiBench Online: Interactive Benchmarking of Persistent Memory Indexes
abstract
The emergence of persistent memory (PM), such as Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory Modules (DCPMM), opened up many opportunities for building high-performance indexes directly on PM. However, the many PM indexes proposed by prior work had their evaluation based on PM emulation using DRAM and therefore it was not clear how they would perform on real PM hardware. Moreover, they typically used ad hoc, in-house benchmarks and did not collect PM-specific hardware metrics that are key performance indicators and are instrumental for users and developers to understand the performance behavior of PM indexes. These issues call for a systematic, fair and reproducible approach for evaluating PM indexes. This demonstration highlights the principles and lessons learned from our recent evaluation of PM indexes on real DCPMM and showcases PiBench, a unified benchmarking framework that enables fair and reproducible evaluation of PM indexes. In addition to common metrics, PiBench uniquely integrates monitoring tools to collect PM-specific hardware counters, allowing in-depth performance analysis. Our demonstration is enabled by PiBench Online, a new interactive system built on top of PiBench. Using PiBench Online, users can upload their own index implementations, run preset or customized workloads, and analyze results interactively, all through an easy-to-use web interface. PiBench is open-source and PiBench Online is deployed at https://pibench.org. We hope PiBench Online can promote fair comparison and reproducibility in database and systems communities.
Xiangpeng Hao, Lucas Lersch, Tianzheng Wang 0001, Ismail Oukid
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2020 Enabling Low Tail Latency on Multicore Key-Value Stores
abstract
Modern applications employ key-value stores (KVS) in at least some point of their software stack, often as a caching system or a storage manager. Many of these applications also require a high degree of responsiveness and performance predictability. However, most KVS have similar design decisions which focus on improving throughput metrics, at times by sacrificing latency. While latency can be occasionally reduced by over provisioning hardware, this entails significant increase in costs. In this paper we present RStore, a KVS which focus on low tail latency as its primary goal, while also enabling efficient usage of hardware resources. To that aim, we argue in favor of techniques such as an asynchronous programming model, message-passing communication, and log-structured storage on modern hardware. Throughout the paper we discuss these and other design decisions of RStore that differ from those of more traditional systems. Our evaluation shows that RStore scales its throughput with an increasing number of cores while maintaining a robust behavior with low and predictable latency.
Lucas Lersch, Ivan Schreter, Ismail Oukid, Wolfgang Lehner
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2019 Persistent Buffer Management with Optimistic Consistency
abstract
Finding the best way to leverage non-volatile memory (NVM) on modern database systems is still an open problem. The answer is far from trivial since the clear boundary between memory and storage present in most systems seems to be incompatible with the intrinsic memory-storage duality of NVM. Rather than treating NVM either solely as memory or solely as storage, in this work we propose how NVM can be simultaneously used as both in the context of modern database systems. We design a persistent buffer pool on NVM, enabling pages to be directly read/written by the CPU (like memory) while recovering corrupted pages after a failure (like storage). The main benefits of our approach are an easy integration in the existing database architectures, reduced costs (by replacing DRAM with NVM), and faster peak-performance recovery.
Lucas Lersch, Wolfgang Lehner, Ismail Oukid
DaMoN1
2019 Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes
abstract
Persistent memory (PM) is fundamentally changing the way database index structures are built by enabling persistence, high performance, and (near) instant recovery all on the memory bus. Prior work has proposed many techniques to tailor index structure designs for PM, but they were mostly based on volatile DRAM with simulation due to the lack of real PM hardware. Until today is it unclear how these techniques will actually perform on real PM hardware. With the recent released Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory, for the first time, this paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of recent persistent index structures. We focus on B + -Tree-based range indexes and carefully choose four representative index structures for evaluation: wBTree, NV-Tree, BzTree and FPTree. These four tree structures cover a wide, representative range of techniques that are essential building blocks of PM-based index structures. For fair comparison, we used an unified programming model for all trees and developed PiBench , a benchmarking framework which targets PM-based indexes. Through empirical evaluation using representative workloads, we identify key, effective techniques, insights and caveats to guide the making of future PM-based index structures.
Lucas Lersch, Xiangpeng Hao, Ismail Oukid, Tianzheng Wang 0001, Thomas Willhalm
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2017 Rethinking DRAM Caching for LSMs in an NVRAM Environment
Lucas Lersch, Ismail Oukid, Ivan Schreter, Wolfgang Lehner
ADBIS1
2017 An analysis of LSM caching in NVRAM
abstract
The rise of NVRAM technologies promises to change the way we think about system architectures. In order to fully exploit its advantages, it is required to develop systems specially tailored for NVRAM devices. Not only this imposes great challenges, but developing full system architectures from scratch is undesirable in many scenarios due to prohibitive development costs. Instead, we analyze in this paper the behavior of an existing log-structured persistent key-value store, namely LevelDB, when run on top of an emulated NVRAM device. We investigate initial opportunities for improvement when adapting a system tailored for HDD/SSDs to run on top of an NVRAM environment. Furthermore, we analyze the behavior of the legacy DRAM caching component of LevelDB and whether more suitable caching policies are required.
Lucas Lersch, Ismail Oukid, Wolfgang Lehner, Ivan Schreter
DaMoN1
2016 Update Propagation Strategies for High-Performance OLTP
Caetano Sauer, Lucas Lersch, Theo Härder, Goetz Graefe
ADBIS2