Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peyton Greenside

dblp:180/5393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 84% Computational science and engineering · 16%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.422025
Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025
Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody design
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.612022
Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization
0.612022
Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
denoising autoencoder
0.612022
Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome-wide association study
epistasis detection
0.312018
Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences · Bioinform. 2018
Computational science and engineering › model interpretability
interpretable deep learning
0.312018
Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.312018
Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences · Bioinform. 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.312017
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312017
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
generative sequence model
0.312025
Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
biological sequence design
0.212022
Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

twisted sequential monte carlo · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 1.7large language model · 1.7multi-objective acquisition function · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1feature attribution · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3deep feature interaction maps · 0.3backpropagation · 0.3DeepLIFT · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences
abstract
To build effective therapeutics, biologists iteratively mutate antibody sequences to improve binding and stability. Proposed mutations can be informed by previous measurements or by learning from large antibody databases to predict only typical antibodies. Unfortunately, the space of typical antibodies is enormous to search, and experiments often fail to find suitable antibodies on a budget. We introduce Clone-informed Bayesian Optimization (CloneBO), a Bayesian optimization procedure that efficiently optimizes antibodies in the lab by teaching a generative model how our immune system optimizes antibodies. Our immune system makes antibodies by iteratively evolving specific portions of their sequences to bind their target strongly and stably, resulting in a set of related, evolving sequences known as a *clonal family*. We train a large language model, CloneLM, on hundreds of thousands of clonal families and use it to design sequences with mutations that are most likely to optimize an antibody within the human immune system. We propose to guide our designs to fit previous measurements with a twisted sequential Monte Carlo procedure. We show that CloneBO optimizes antibodies substantially more efficiently than previous methods in realistic *in silico* experiments and designs stronger and more stable binders in *in vitro* wet lab experiments.
Alan Nawzad Amin, Nate Gruver, Yilun Kuang, Yucen Lily Li, Hunter Elliott, Calvin McCarter, Aniruddh Raghu, Peyton Greenside, Andrew Gordon Wilson
ICLR8
2022 Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders
abstract
Bayesian optimization (BayesOpt) is a gold standard for query-efficient continuous optimization. However, its adoption for drug design has been hindered by the discrete, high-dimensional nature of the decision variables. We develop a new approach (LaMBO) which jointly trains a denoising autoencoder with a discriminative multi-task Gaussian process head, allowing gradient-based optimization of multi-objective acquisition functions in the latent space of the autoencoder. These acquisition functions allow LaMBO to balance the explore-exploit tradeoff over multiple design rounds, and to balance objective tradeoffs by optimizing sequences at many different points on the Pareto frontier. We evaluate LaMBO on two small-molecule design tasks, and introduce new tasks optimizing in silico and in vitro properties of large-molecule fluorescent proteins. In our experiments LaMBO outperforms genetic optimizers and does not require a large pretraining corpus, demonstrating that BayesOpt is practical and effective for biological sequence design.
Samuel Stanton, Wesley J. Maddox, Nate Gruver, Phillip M. Maffettone, Emily Delaney, Peyton Greenside, Andrew Gordon Wilson
ICML6
2018 Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences
abstract
Motivation: Transcription factors bind regulatory DNA sequences in a combinatorial manner to modulate gene expression. Deep neural networks (DNNs) can learn the cis-regulatory grammars encoded in regulatory DNA sequences associated with transcription factor binding and chromatin accessibility. Several feature attribution methods have been developed for estimating the predictive importance of individual features (nucleotides or motifs) in any input DNA sequence to its associated output prediction from a DNN model. However, these methods do not reveal higher-order feature interactions encoded by the models. Results: We present a new method called Deep Feature Interaction Maps (DFIM) to efficiently estimate interactions between all pairs of features in any input DNA sequence. DFIM accurately identifies ground truth motif interactions embedded in simulated regulatory DNA sequences. DFIM identifies synergistic interactions between GATA1 and TAL1 motifs from in vivo TF binding models. DFIM reveals epistatic interactions involving nucleotides flanking the core motif of the Cbf1 TF in yeast from in vitro TF binding models. We also apply DFIM to regulatory sequence models of in vivo chromatin accessibility to reveal interactions between regulatory genetic variants and proximal motifs of target TFs as validated by TF binding quantitative trait loci. Our approach makes significant strides in improving the interpretability of deep learning models for genomics. Availability and implementation: Code is available at: https://github.com/kundajelab/dfim. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Peyton Greenside, Tyler Shimko, Polly Fordyce, Anshul Kundaje
Bioinform.1
2017 Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
abstract
The purported “black box” nature of neural networks is a barrier to adoption in applications where interpretability is essential. Here we present DeepLIFT (Deep Learning Important FeaTures), a method for decomposing the output prediction of a neural network on a specific input by backpropagating the contributions of all neurons in the network to every feature of the input. DeepLIFT compares the activation of each neuron to its `reference activation’ and assigns contribution scores according to the difference. By optionally giving separate consideration to positive and negative contributions, DeepLIFT can also reveal dependencies which are missed by other approaches. Scores can be computed efficiently in a single backward pass. We apply DeepLIFT to models trained on MNIST and simulated genomic data, and show significant advantages over gradient-based methods. Video tutorial: http://goo.gl/qKb7pL code: http://goo.gl/RM8jvH
Avanti Shrikumar, Peyton Greenside, Anshul Kundaje
ICML2