EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vaishakh Ravindrakumar
dblp:180/5566
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 84% Reinforcement learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 70% Computational complexity · 12% Information theory · 9% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Content delivery and video streaming · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | TURF: Two-Factor, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · ICML 2022 SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018 |
Content delivery and video streaming › caching
coded caching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Privacy and data protection › web privacy
cache privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy metrics › privacy quantification
information-theoretic privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › selection
maximum selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · NeurIPS 2020 |
Information theory › information-theoretic limits
information-theoretic lower bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial approximation · 1.1piecewise polynomial estimation · 1.1information-theoretic bounds · 1.0coded caching · 1.0empirical probability interpolation · 0.9divide-and-conquer · 0.9stochastic transitivity · 0.6pairwise comparison · 0.3borda score · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | TURF: Two-Factor, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning AlgorithmabstractApproximating distributions from their samples is a canonical statistical-learning problem. One of its most powerful and successful modalities approximates every distribution to an $\ell_1$ distance essentially at most a constant times larger than its closest $t$-piece degree-$d$ polynomial, where $t\ge1$ and $d\ge0$. Letting $c_{t,d}$ denote the smallest such factor, clearly $c_{1,0}=1$, and it can be shown that $c_{t,d}\ge 2$ for all other $t$ and $d$. Yet current computationally efficient algorithms show only $c_{t,1}\le 2.25$ and the bound rises quickly to $c_{t,d}\le 3$ for $d\ge 9$. We derive a near-linear-time and essentially sample-optimal estimator that establishes $c_{t,d}=2$ for all $(t,d)\ne(1,0)$. Additionally, for many practical distributions, the lowest approximation distance is achieved by polynomials with vastly varying number of pieces. We provide a method that estimates this number near-optimally, hence helps approach the best possible approximation. Experiments combining the two techniques confirm improved performance over existing methodologies. Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar |
ICML | 4 |
| 2020 | SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning AlgorithmabstractSample- and computationally-efficient distribution estimation is a fundamental tenet in statistics and machine learning. We present $\SURF$, an algorithm for approximating distributions by piecewise polynomials. $\SURF$ is: simple, replacing prior complex optimization techniques by straight-forward empirical probability approximation of each potential polynomial piece through simple empirical-probability interpolation, and using plain divide-and-conquer to merge the pieces; universal, as well-known polynomial-approximation results imply that it accurately approximates a large class of common distributions; robust to distribution mis-specification as for any degree $d \le 8$, it estimates any distribution to an $\ell_1$ distance $< 3$ times that of the nearest degree-$d$ piecewise polynomial, improving known factor upper bounds of 3 for single polynomials and 15 for polynomials with arbitrarily many pieces; fast, using optimal sample complexity, running in near sample-linear time, and if given sorted samples it may be parallelized to run in sub-linear time. In experiments, $\SURF$ outperforms state-of-the art algorithms. Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2018 | The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference LearningabstractWe present a comprehensive understanding of three important problems in PAC preference learning: maximum selection (maxing), ranking, and estimating all pairwise preference probabilities, in the adaptive setting. With just Weak Stochastic Transitivity, we show that maxing requires $\Omega(n^2)$ comparisons and with slightly more restrictive Medium Stochastic Transitivity, we present a linear complexity maxing algorithm. With Strong Stochastic Transitivity and Stochastic Triangle Inequality, we derive a ranking algorithm with optimal $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ complexity and an optimal algorithm that estimates all pairwise preference probabilities. Moein Falahatgar, Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar |
ICML | 5 |
| 2018 | Private Coded CachingabstractRecent work by Maddah-Ali and Niesen (2014) introduced coded caching which demonstrated the benefits of joint design of storage and transmission policies in content delivery networks. They studied a setup where a server communicates with a set of users, each equipped with a local cache, over a shared error-free link and proposed an order-optimal caching and delivery scheme. In this paper, we introduce the problem of private coded caching where we impose the additional constraint that no user learns any information about the contents of the files it did not request from what is stored in its cache and the server transmissions. We propose a feasible scheme for this setting and demonstrate its order-optimality by deriving information-theoretic lower bounds. Vaishakh Ravindrakumar, Parthasarathi Panda, Nikhil Karamchandani, Vinod M. Prabhakaran |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2017 | Maxing and Ranking with Few AssumptionsabstractPAC maximum selection (maxing) and ranking of $n$ elements via random pairwise comparisons have diverse applications and have been studied under many models and assumptions. With just one simple natural assumption: strong stochastic transitivity, we show that maxing can be performed with linearly many comparisons yet ranking requires quadratically many. With no assumptions at all, we show that for the Borda-score metric, maximum selection can be performed with linearly many comparisons and ranking can be performed with $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ comparisons. Moein Falahatgar, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar |
NIPS | 5 |
| 2016 | Fundamental limits of secretive coded cachingabstractRecent work by Maddah-Ali and Niesen introduced coded caching which demonstrated the benefits of joint design of storage and transmission policies in content delivery networks. They studied a setup where a server communicates with a set of users, each equipped with a local cache, over a shared error-free link and proposed an order-optimal caching and delivery scheme. In this paper, we introduce the problem of secretive coded caching where we impose the additional constraint that a user should not be able to learn anything, from either the content stored in its cache or the server transmissions, about a file it did not request. We propose a feasible scheme for this setting and demonstrate its order-optimality with respect to information-theoretic lower bounds. Vaishakh Ravindrakumar, Parthasarathi Panda, Nikhil Karamchandani, Vinod M. Prabhakaran |
ISIT | 1 |