Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Vaishakh Ravindrakumar

dblp:180/5566 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 84% Reinforcement learning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 70% Computational complexity · 12% Information theory · 9%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Content delivery and video streaming · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning
1.022022
TURF: Two-Factor, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · ICML 2022
SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.312018
The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.312018
The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
ranking
0.312018
The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning · ICML 2018
Content delivery and video streaming › caching
coded caching
0.312018
Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018
Privacy and data protection › web privacy
cache privacy
0.312018
Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018
Privacy and data protection › privacy metrics › privacy quantification
information-theoretic privacy
0.312018
Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018
Algorithms and data structures › selection
maximum selection
0.312017
Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017
Algorithms and data structures
ranking
0.312017
Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.112020
SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm · NeurIPS 2020
Information theory › information-theoretic limits
information-theoretic lower bounds
0.112018
Private Coded Caching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference learning
0.112017
Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial approximation · 1.1piecewise polynomial estimation · 1.1information-theoretic bounds · 1.0coded caching · 1.0empirical probability interpolation · 0.9divide-and-conquer · 0.9stochastic transitivity · 0.6pairwise comparison · 0.3borda score · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 TURF: Two-Factor, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm
abstract
Approximating distributions from their samples is a canonical statistical-learning problem. One of its most powerful and successful modalities approximates every distribution to an $\ell_1$ distance essentially at most a constant times larger than its closest $t$-piece degree-$d$ polynomial, where $t\ge1$ and $d\ge0$. Letting $c_{t,d}$ denote the smallest such factor, clearly $c_{1,0}=1$, and it can be shown that $c_{t,d}\ge 2$ for all other $t$ and $d$. Yet current computationally efficient algorithms show only $c_{t,1}\le 2.25$ and the bound rises quickly to $c_{t,d}\le 3$ for $d\ge 9$. We derive a near-linear-time and essentially sample-optimal estimator that establishes $c_{t,d}=2$ for all $(t,d)\ne(1,0)$. Additionally, for many practical distributions, the lowest approximation distance is achieved by polynomials with vastly varying number of pieces. We provide a method that estimates this number near-optimally, hence helps approach the best possible approximation. Experiments combining the two techniques confirm improved performance over existing methodologies.
Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar
ICML4
2020 SURF: A Simple, Universal, Robust, Fast Distribution Learning Algorithm
abstract
Sample- and computationally-efficient distribution estimation is a fundamental tenet in statistics and machine learning. We present $\SURF$, an algorithm for approximating distributions by piecewise polynomials. $\SURF$ is: simple, replacing prior complex optimization techniques by straight-forward empirical probability approximation of each potential polynomial piece through simple empirical-probability interpolation, and using plain divide-and-conquer to merge the pieces; universal, as well-known polynomial-approximation results imply that it accurately approximates a large class of common distributions; robust to distribution mis-specification as for any degree $d \le 8$, it estimates any distribution to an $\ell_1$ distance $< 3$ times that of the nearest degree-$d$ piecewise polynomial, improving known factor upper bounds of 3 for single polynomials and 15 for polynomials with arbitrarily many pieces; fast, using optimal sample complexity, running in near sample-linear time, and if given sorted samples it may be parallelized to run in sub-linear time. In experiments, $\SURF$ outperforms state-of-the art algorithms.
Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar
NeurIPS4
2018 The Limits of Maxing, Ranking, and Preference Learning
abstract
We present a comprehensive understanding of three important problems in PAC preference learning: maximum selection (maxing), ranking, and estimating all pairwise preference probabilities, in the adaptive setting. With just Weak Stochastic Transitivity, we show that maxing requires $\Omega(n^2)$ comparisons and with slightly more restrictive Medium Stochastic Transitivity, we present a linear complexity maxing algorithm. With Strong Stochastic Transitivity and Stochastic Triangle Inequality, we derive a ranking algorithm with optimal $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ complexity and an optimal algorithm that estimates all pairwise preference probabilities.
Moein Falahatgar, Ayush Jain 0001, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar
ICML5
2018 Private Coded Caching
abstract
Recent work by Maddah-Ali and Niesen (2014) introduced coded caching which demonstrated the benefits of joint design of storage and transmission policies in content delivery networks. They studied a setup where a server communicates with a set of users, each equipped with a local cache, over a shared error-free link and proposed an order-optimal caching and delivery scheme. In this paper, we introduce the problem of private coded caching where we impose the additional constraint that no user learns any information about the contents of the files it did not request from what is stored in its cache and the server transmissions. We propose a feasible scheme for this setting and demonstrate its order-optimality by deriving information-theoretic lower bounds.
Vaishakh Ravindrakumar, Parthasarathi Panda, Nikhil Karamchandani, Vinod M. Prabhakaran
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2017 Maxing and Ranking with Few Assumptions
abstract
PAC maximum selection (maxing) and ranking of $n$ elements via random pairwise comparisons have diverse applications and have been studied under many models and assumptions. With just one simple natural assumption: strong stochastic transitivity, we show that maxing can be performed with linearly many comparisons yet ranking requires quadratically many. With no assumptions at all, we show that for the Borda-score metric, maximum selection can be performed with linearly many comparisons and ranking can be performed with $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ comparisons.
Moein Falahatgar, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati, Vaishakh Ravindrakumar
NIPS5
2016 Fundamental limits of secretive coded caching
abstract
Recent work by Maddah-Ali and Niesen introduced coded caching which demonstrated the benefits of joint design of storage and transmission policies in content delivery networks. They studied a setup where a server communicates with a set of users, each equipped with a local cache, over a shared error-free link and proposed an order-optimal caching and delivery scheme. In this paper, we introduce the problem of secretive coded caching where we impose the additional constraint that a user should not be able to learn anything, from either the content stored in its cache or the server transmissions, about a file it did not request. We propose a feasible scheme for this setting and demonstrate its order-optimality with respect to information-theoretic lower bounds.
Vaishakh Ravindrakumar, Parthasarathi Panda, Nikhil Karamchandani, Vinod M. Prabhakaran
ISIT1