James E. Johndrow

dblp:180/5657 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Learning theory · 36%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.822020
Scalable Approximate MCMC Algorithms for the Horseshoe Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Scaling up Data Augmentation MCMC via Calibration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.412020
Scalable Approximate MCMC Algorithms for the Horseshoe Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics
0.412020
Scalable Approximate MCMC Algorithms for the Horseshoe Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation
0.412020
Scalable Approximate MCMC Algorithms for the Horseshoe Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
metropolis-hastings
0.312018
Scaling up Data Augmentation MCMC via Calibration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix product approximation · 0.4approximate MCMC · 0.4variance adjustment · 0.3calibration · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Scalable Approximate MCMC Algorithms for the Horseshoe Prior
abstract
The horseshoe prior is frequently employed in Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional models, and has been shown to achieve minimax optimal risk properties when the truth is sparse. While optimization-based algorithms for the extremely popular Lasso and elastic net procedures can scale to dimension in the hundreds of thousands, algorithms for the horseshoe that use Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for computation are limited to problems an order of magnitude smaller. This is due to high computational cost per step and growth of the variance of time-averaging estimators as a function of dimension. We propose two new MCMC algorithms for computation in these models that have significantly improved performance compared to existing alternatives. One of the algorithms also approximates an expensive matrix product to give orders of magnitude speedup in high-dimensional applications. We prove guarantees for the accuracy of the approximate algorithm, and show that gradually decreasing the approximation error as the chain extends results in an exact algorithm. The scalability of the algorithm is illustrated in simulations with problem size as large as $N=5,000$ observations and $p=50,000$ predictors, and an application to a genome-wide association study with $N=2,267$ and $p=98,385$. The empirical results also show that the new algorithm yields estimates with lower mean squared error, intervals with better coverage, and elucidates features of the posterior that were often missed by previous algorithms in high dimensions, including bimodality of posterior marginals indicating uncertainty about which covariates belong in the model.
James E. Johndrow, Paulo Orenstein, Anirban Bhattacharya
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2018 Scaling up Data Augmentation MCMC via Calibration
abstract
There has been considerable interest in making Bayesian inference more scalable. In big data settings, most of the focus has been on reducing the computing time per iteration rather than reducing the number of iterations needed in Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). This article considers data augmentation MCMC (DA-MCMC), a widely used technique. DA-MCMC samples tend to become highly autocorrelated in large samples, due to a mis-calibration problem in which conditional posterior distributions given augmented data are too concentrated. This makes it necessary to collect very long MCMC paths to obtain acceptably low MC error. To combat this inefficiency, we propose a family of calibrated data augmentation algorithms, which appropriately adjust the variance of conditional posterior distributions. A Metropolis-Hastings step is used to eliminate bias in the stationary distribution of the resulting sampler. Compared to existing alternatives, this approach can dramatically reduce MC error by reducing autocorrelation and increasing the effective number of DA-MCMC samples per unit of computing time. The approach is simple and applicable to a broad variety of existing data augmentation algorithms. We focus on three popular generalized linear models: probit, logistic and Poisson log-linear. Dramatic gains in computational efficiency are shown in applications.
Leo L. Duan, James E. Johndrow, David B. Dunson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2013 Diagonal Orthant Multinomial Probit Models
abstract
Bayesian classification commonly relies on probit models, with data augmentation algorithms used for posterior computation. By imputing latent Gaussian variables, one can often trivially adapt computational approaches used in Gaussian models. However, MCMC for multinomial probit (MNP) models can be inefficient in practice due to high posterior dependence between latent variables and parameters, and to difficulties in efficiently sampling latent variables when there are more than two categories. To address these problems, we propose a new class of diagonal orthant (DO) multinomial models. The key characteristics of these models include conditional independence of the latent variables given model parameters, avoidance of arbitrary identifiability restrictions, and simple expressions for category probabilities. We show substantially improved computational efficiency and comparable predictive performance to MNP.
James E. Johndrow, David B. Dunson, Kristian Lum
AISTATS1