Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luca Saglietti
dblp:180/5743
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Learning paradigms · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Information theory · 33% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks · ICML 2024 An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse training
lottery ticket hypothesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical physics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
teacher-student framework |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
trajectory learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
approximate message passing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Approximate Survey Propagation for High-Dimensional Estimation · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
high-dimensional estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Approximate Survey Propagation for High-Dimensional Estimation · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
phase retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Approximate Survey Propagation for High-Dimensional Estimation · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gaussian Process Prior Variational Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process prior |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gaussian Process Prior Variational Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gaussian Process Prior Variational Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing · 0.9attention map analysis · 0.9teacher-student framework · 0.6statistical physics · 0.6gaussian prior · 0.6consolidation · 0.6state evolution · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4approximate survey propagation · 0.4variational inference · 0.3stochastic backpropagation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical FilteringabstractUnderstanding the learning process and the embedded computation in transformers is becoming a central goal for the development of interpretable AI. In the present study, we introduce a hierarchical filtering procedure for data models of sequences on trees, allowing us to hand-tune the range of positional correlations in the data. Leveraging this controlled setting, we provide evidence that vanilla encoder-only transformers can approximate the exact inference algorithm when trained on root classification and masked language modeling tasks, and study *how* this computation is discovered and implemented. We find that correlations at larger distances, corresponding to increasing layers of the hierarchy, are sequentially included by the network during training.
By comparing attention maps from models trained with varying degrees of filtering and by probing the different encoder levels, we find clear evidence of a reconstruction of correlations on successive length scales corresponding to the various levels of the hierarchy, which we relate to a plausible implementation of the exact inference algorithm within the same architecture. Jerome Garnier-Brun, Marc Mézard, Emanuele Moscato, Luca Saglietti |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | On the Bias of Next-Token Predictors Toward Systematically Inefficient Reasoning: A Shortest-Path Case StudyabstractRecent advances in natural language processing highlight two key factors for improving reasoning in large language models (LLMs): (i) allocating more test-time compute tends to help on harder problems but often introduces redundancy in the reasoning trace, and (ii) compute is most effective when reasoning is systematic and incremental, forming structured chains of thought (CoTs) akin to human problem-solving. To study these factors in isolation, we introduce a controlled setting based on shortest-path tasks in layered graphs. We train decoder-only transformers on question–trace–answer triples using a custom tokenizer, comparing models trained on optimal bottom-up dynamic programming traces with those trained on longer, valid traces involving backtracking. Surprisingly, under the same training-token budget, the latter models generalize better to unseen graphs. This benefit is not due to length alone—injecting arbitrary redundancy into reasoning traces fails to help and can even hurt performance. Instead, we find that generalization correlates with the model's confidence in next-token prediction, suggesting that long, coherent, and locally incremental traces make the training signal easier to optimize. Riccardo Alberghi, Elizaveta Demyanenko, Luca Biggio, Luca Saglietti |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural NetworksabstractA wide range of empirical and theoretical works have shown that overparameterisation can amplify the performance of neural networks. According to the lottery ticket hypothesis, overparameterised networks have an increased chance of containing a sub-network that is well-initialised to solve the task at hand. A more parsimonious approach, inspired by animal learning, consists in guiding the learner towards solving the task by curating the order of the examples, ie. providing a curriculum. However, this learning strategy seems to be hardly beneficial in deep learning applications. In this work, we propose a theoretical analysis that connects curriculum learning and overparameterisation. In particular, we investigate their interplay in the online learning setting for a 2-layer network in the XOR-like Gaussian Mixture problem. Our results show that a high degree of overparameterisation---while simplifying the problem---can limit the benefit from curricula, providing a theoretical account of the ineffectiveness of curricula in deep learning. Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Yaraslau Ivashinka, Andrew M. Saxe, Luca Saglietti |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Compressed sensing with ℓ0-norm: statistical physics analysis & algorithms for signal recoveryabstractNoiseless compressive sensing is a protocol that enables undersampling and later recovery of a signal without loss of information. This compression is possible because the signal is usually sufficiently sparse in a given basis. Currently, the algorithm offering the best tradeoff between compression rate, robustness, and speed for compressive sensing is the LASSO (ℓ1-norm bias) algorithm. However, many studies have pointed out the possibility that the implementation of ℓp-norms biases, with p smaller than one, could give better performance while sacrificing convexity. In this work, we focus specifically on the extreme case of the ℓ0-based reconstruction, a task that is complicated by the discontinuity of the loss. In the first part of the paper, we describe via statistical physics methods, and in particular the replica method, how the solutions to this optimization problem are arranged in a clustered structure. We observe two distinct regimes: one at low compression rate where the signal can be recovered exactly, and one at high compression rate where the signal cannot be recovered accurately. In the second part, we present two message-passing algorithms based on our first results for the ℓ0-norm optimization problem. The proposed algorithms are able to recover the signal at compression rates higher than the ones achieved by LASSO while being computationally efficient. Damien Barbier, Carlo Lucibello, Luca Saglietti, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
ITW | 3 |
| 2022 | An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student NetworksabstractIn animals and humans, curriculum learning---presenting data in a curated order---is critical to rapid learning and effective pedagogy. A long history of experiments has demonstrated the impact of curricula in a variety of animals but, despite its ubiquitous presence, a theoretical understanding of the phenomenon is still lacking. Surprisingly, in contrast to animal learning, curricula strategies are not widely used in machine learning and recent simulation studies reach the conclusion that curricula are moderately effective or ineffective in most cases. This stark difference in the importance of curriculum raises a fundamental theoretical question: when and why does curriculum learning help? In this work, we analyse a prototypical neural network model of curriculum learning in the high-dimensional limit, employing statistical physics methods. We study a task in which a sparse set of informative features are embedded amidst a large set of noisy features. We analytically derive average learning trajectories for simple neural networks on this task, which establish a clear speed benefit for curriculum learning in the online setting. However, when training experiences can be stored and replayed (for instance, during sleep), the advantage of curriculum in standard neural networks disappears, in line with observations from the deep learning literature. Inspired by synaptic consolidation techniques developed to combat catastrophic forgetting, we investigate whether consolidating synapses at curriculum change points can boost the benefits of curricula. We derive generalisation performance as a function of consolidation strength (implemented as a Gaussian prior connecting learning phases), and show that this consolidation mechanism can yield a large improvement in test performance. Our reduced analytical descriptions help reconcile apparently conflicting empirical results, trace regimes where curriculum learning yields the largest gains, and provide experimentally-accessible predictions for the impact of task parameters on curriculum benefits. More broadly, our results suggest that fully exploiting a curriculum may require explicit consolidation at curriculum boundaries. Luca Saglietti, Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Andrew M. Saxe |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Generalized Approximate Survey Propagation for High-Dimensional EstimationabstractIn Generalized Linear Estimation (GLE) problems, we seek to estimate a signal that is observed through a linear transform followed by a component-wise, possibly nonlinear and noisy, channel. In the Bayesian optimal setting, Generalized Approximate Message Passing (GAMP) is known to achieve optimal performance for GLE. However, its performance can significantly deteriorate whenever there is a mismatch between the assumed and the true generative model, a situation frequently encountered in practice. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, named Generalized Approximate Survey Propagation (GASP), for solving GLE in the presence of prior or model misspecifications. As a prototypical example, we consider the phase retrieval problem, where we show that GASP outperforms the corresponding GAMP, reducing the reconstruction threshold and, for certain choices of its parameters, approaching Bayesian optimal performance. Furthermore, we present a set of state evolution equations that can precisely characterize the performance of GASP in the high-dimensional limit. Carlo Lucibello, Luca Saglietti, Yue M. Lu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Gaussian Process Prior Variational AutoencodersabstractVariational autoencoders (VAE) are a powerful and widely-used class of models to learn complex data distributions in an unsupervised fashion. One important limitation of VAEs is the prior assumption that latent sample representations are independent and identically distributed. However, for many important datasets, such as time-series of images, this assumption is too strong: accounting for covariances between samples, such as those in time, can yield to a more appropriate model specification and improve performance in downstream tasks. In this work, we introduce a new model, the Gaussian Process (GP) Prior Variational Autoencoder (GPPVAE), to specifically address this issue. The GPPVAE aims to combine the power of VAEs with the ability to model correlations afforded by GP priors. To achieve efficient inference in this new class of models, we leverage structure in the covariance matrix, and introduce a new stochastic backpropagation strategy that allows for computing stochastic gradients in a distributed and low-memory fashion. We show that our method outperforms conditional VAEs (CVAEs) and an adaptation of standard VAEs in two image data applications. Francesco Paolo Casale, Adrian V. Dalca, Luca Saglietti, Jennifer Listgarten, Nicolò Fusi |
NeurIPS | 3 |