EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karyl J. Gurzi
dblp:180/6344
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1965
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy › modular redundancy
triple modular redundancy |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | Estimates for Best Placement of Voters in a Triplicated Logic Network · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault masking
voter placement |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | Estimates for Best Placement of Voters in a Triplicated Logic Network · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
majority voting |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | Estimates for Best Placement of Voters in a Triplicated Logic Network · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reliability analysis · 0.0probabilistic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | Estimates for Best Placement of Voters in a Triplicated Logic NetworkabstractThe reliability of a network of elements may be improved by triplicating the network and determining the output using majority voting logic. The reliability of the triplicated network depends on how the network is subdivided for voting purposes and the type of majority voting logic used. The optimum arrangement of elements and voters is established for the single voter scheme, and an estimate of the optimum arrangement is derived for the three voter scheme. Upper and lower bounds on possible improvements through triplication are determined, and a comparison is made of the single voter and three voter schemes. All results are presented in graphical form. Karyl J. Gurzi |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 1 |