Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eunki Kim
dblp:180/6956
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 32% Vision and language · 24% Language models and text generation · 19% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
CLIP |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sightation Counts: Leveraging Sighted User Feedback in Building a BLV-aligned Dataset of Diagram Descriptions · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning › cross-modal representation learning
modality gap |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning › reward modeling
reward model robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality Gap · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sighted user feedback · 1.7dataset construction · 1.7reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.9normalization layer · 0.9embedding standardization · 0.9bradley-terry model · 0.9batch-wise sum-to-zero regularization · 0.9RLOO · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | I0T: Embedding Standardization Method Towards Zero Modality GapabstractContrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) enables zero-shot inference in downstream tasks such as image-text retrieval and classification.However, recent works extending CLIP suffer from the issue of modality gap, which arises when the image and text embeddings are projected to disparate manifolds, deviating from the intended objective of image-text contrastive learning.We discover that this phenomenon is linked to the modality-specific characteristic that each image or text encoder independently possesses.Herein, we propose two methods to address the modality gap: (1) a post-hoc embedding standardization method, I0T post that reduces the modality gap approximately to zero and (2) a trainable method, I0T async , to alleviate the modality gap problem by adding two normalization layers for each encoder.Our I0T framework can significantly reduce the modality gap while preserving the original embedding representations of trained models with their locked parameters.In practice, I0T post can serve as an alternative explainable automatic evaluation metric of widely used CLIPScore (CLIP-S).The code is available in https://github.com/xfactlab/I0T. Na Min An, Eunki Kim, James Thorne, Hyunjung Shim |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Sightation Counts: Leveraging Sighted User Feedback in Building a BLV-aligned Dataset of Diagram DescriptionsabstractWan Ju Kang, Eunki Kim, Na Min An, Sangryul Kim, Haemin Choi, Ki Hoon Kwak, James Thorne. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Wan Ju Kang, Eunki Kim, Na Min An, Sangryul Kim, Haemin Choi, Ki Hoon Kwak, James Thorne |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM AlignmentabstractReinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an $\alpha$-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and over-optimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance. Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, Jiwoo Hong, Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Parag Agrawal, Natesh S. Pillai, S. Sathiya Keerthi |
ICML | 9 |
| 2025 | On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model AlignmentabstractThe Bradley-Terry (BT) model is widely practiced in reward modeling for reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF). Despite its effectiveness, reward models (RMs) trained with BT model loss as one-way classifiers are prone to over-optimization, losing generalizability to unseen inputs. In this paper, we study the cause of over-optimization and its downstream effects on the RLHF procedure, highlighting the importance of robustness in RMs. First, we show that the excessive dispersion of hidden state norms is the main source of over-optimization. Correspondingly, we propose batch-wise sum-to-zero regularization (BSR) that enforces reward sum for each batch to be zero-centered, constraining the rewards with abnormally large magnitudes. We assess the impact of BSR in improving robustness in RMs through four scenarios of over-optimization, where BSR consistently manifests better robustness on unseen inputs. Then, we compare the plain BT model and BSR on RLHF training and empirically show that robust RMs better align the policy to the gold preference model. Finally, we apply BSR to high-quality data and models, which surpasses state-of-the-art RMs in the 8B scale by adding more than 5\% in complex preference prediction tasks. By conducting RLOO training with 8B RMs, AlpacaEval 2.0, with reducing generation length by 40\% while adding a 7\% increase in win rate, further highlights that robustness in RMs induces robustness in RLHF training. Jiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Guijin Son, Woojin Chung, Shao Tang, James Thorne |
ICML | 3 |