Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tyler Westenbroek
dblp:180/7172
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 36% Reinforcement learning · 32% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real-World via Simulation-Guided Fine-Tuning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real-World via Simulation-Guided Fine-Tuning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Power of Learned Locally Linear Models for Nonlinear Policy Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Power of Learned Locally Linear Models for Nonlinear Policy Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
system identification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Power of Learned Locally Linear Models for Nonlinear Policy Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Feedback Linearization for Uncertain Systems via Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Feedback Linearization for Uncertain Systems via Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Feedback Linearization for Uncertain Systems via Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Feedback Linearization for Uncertain Systems via Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value function · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9trajectory optimization · 0.7iterative LQR · 0.7model-free policy optimization · 0.4function approximation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real-World via Simulation-Guided Fine-TuningabstractRobot learning requires a considerable amount of high-quality data to realize the promise of generalization. However, large data sets are costly to collect in the real world. Physics simulators can cheaply generate vast data sets with broad coverage over states, actions, and environments. However, physics engines are fundamentally misspecified approximations to reality. This makes direct zero-shot transfer from simulation to reality challenging, especially in tasks where precise and force-sensitive manipulation is necessary. Thus, fine-tuning these policies with small real-world data sets is an appealing pathway for scaling robot learning. However, current reinforcement learning fine-tuning frameworks leverage general, unstructured exploration strategies which are too inefficient to make real-world adaptation practical. This paper introduces the \emph{Simulation-Guided Fine-tuning} (SGFT) framework, which demonstrates how to extract structural priors from physics simulators to substantially accelerate real-world adaptation. Specifically, our approach uses a value function learned in simulation to guide real-world exploration. We demonstrate this approach across five real-world dexterous manipulation tasks where zero-shot sim-to-real transfer fails. We further demonstrate our framework substantially outperforms baseline fine-tuning methods, requiring up to an order of magnitude fewer real-world samples and succeeding at difficult tasks where prior approaches fail entirely. Last but not least, we provide theoretical justification for this new paradigm which underpins how SGFT can rapidly learn high-performance policies in the face of large sim-to-real dynamics gaps. Patrick Yin, Tyler Westenbroek, Ching-An Cheng, Andrey Kolobov |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | The Power of Learned Locally Linear Models for Nonlinear Policy OptimizationabstractA common pipeline in learning-based control is to iteratively estimate a model of system dynamics, and apply a trajectory optimization algorithm - e.g. $\mathtt{iLQR}$ - on the learned model to minimize a target cost. This paper conducts a rigorous analysis of a simplified variant of this strategy for general nonlinear systems. We analyze an algorithm which iterates between estimating local linear models of nonlinear system dynamics and performing $\mathtt{iLQR}$-like policy updates. We demonstrate that this algorithm attains sample complexity polynomial in relevant problem parameters, and, by synthesizing locally stabilizing gains, overcomes exponential dependence in problem horizon. Experimental results validate the performance of our algorithm, and compare to natural deep-learning baselines. Daniel Pfrommer, Max Simchowitz, Tyler Westenbroek, Nikolai Matni, Stephen Tu |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Feedback Linearization for Uncertain Systems via Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present a novel approach to control design for nonlinear systems which leverages model-free policy optimization techniques to learn a linearizing controller for a physical plant with unknown dynamics. Feedback linearization is a technique from nonlinear control which renders the input-output dynamics of a nonlinear plant linear under application of an appropriate feedback controller. Once a linearizing controller has been constructed, desired output trajectories for the nonlinear plant can be tracked using a variety of linear control techniques. However, the calculation of a linearizing controller requires a precise dynamics model for the system. As a result, model-based approaches for learning exact linearizing controllers generally require a simple, highly structured model of the system with easily identifiable parameters. In contrast, the model-free approach presented in this paper is able to approximate the linearizing controller for the plant using general function approximation architectures. Specifically, we formulate a continuous-time optimization problem over the parameters of a learned linearizing controller whose optima are the set of parameters which best linearize the plant. We derive conditions under which the learning problem is (strongly) convex and provide guarantees which ensure the true linearizing controller for the plant is recovered. We then discuss how model-free policy optimization algorithms can be used to solve a discrete-time approximation to the problem using data collected from the real-world plant. The utility of the framework is demonstrated in simulation and on a real-world robotic platform. Tyler Westenbroek, David Fridovich-Keil, Eric Mazumdar, Shreyas Arora, Valmik Prabhu, S. Shankar Sastry, Claire J. Tomlin |
ICRA | 1 |