Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunus Emre Sahin

dblp:180/7181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-3585-608XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 45% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 45% Autonomous driving · 10%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination
0.412020
Multirobot Coordination With Counting Temporal Logics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
temporal logic planning
0.412020
Multirobot Coordination With Counting Temporal Logics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2020
Embedded and real-time systems › control systems
controller synthesis
0.312018
Using Control Synthesis to Generate Corner Cases: A Case Study on Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2018
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical systems
0.312018
Using Control Synthesis to Generate Corner Cases: A Case Study on Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization-based heuristics · 0.7controlled invariant set computation · 0.7optimization-based trajectory generation · 0.4counting linear temporal logic · 0.4reachability games · 0.3reachability game · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Multirobot Coordination With Counting Temporal Logics
abstract
In many multirobot applications, planning trajectories in a way to guarantee that the collective behavior of the robots satisfies a certain high-level specification is crucial. Motivated by this problem, we introduce counting temporal logics-formal languages that enable concise expression of multirobot task specifications over possibly infinite horizons in this article. We first introduce a general logic called counting linear temporal logic plus (cLTL+), and propose an optimization-based method that generates individual trajectories such that satisfaction of a given cLTL+ formula is guaranteed when these trajectories are synchronously executed. We then introduce a fragment of cLTL+, called counting linear temporal logic (cLTL), and show that a solution to a planning problem with cLTL constraints can be obtained more efficiently if all robots have identical dynamics. In the second part of this article, we relax the synchrony assumption and discuss how to generate trajectories that can be asynchronously executed, while preserving the satisfaction of the desired cLTL+ specification. In particular, we show that when the asynchrony between robots is bounded, the method presented in this article can be modified to generate robust trajectories. We demonstrate these ideas with an experiment and provide numerical results that showcase the scalability of the method.
Yunus Emre Sahin, Petter Nilsson, Necmiye Ozay
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2018 Using Control Synthesis to Generate Corner Cases: A Case Study on Autonomous Driving
abstract
This paper employs correct-by-construction control synthesis, in particular controlled invariant set computations, for falsification. Our hypothesis is that if it is possible to compute a “large enough” controlled invariant set either for the actual system model or some simplification of the system model, interesting corner cases for other control designs can be generated by sampling initial conditions from the boundary of this controlled invariant set. Moreover, if falsifying trajectories for a given control design can be found through such sampling, then the controlled invariant set can be used as a supervisor to ensure safe operation of the control design under consideration. In addition to interesting initial conditions, which are mostly related to safety violations in transients, we use solutions from a dual game, a reachability game for the safety specification, to find falsifying inputs. We also propose optimization-based heuristics for input generation for cases when the state is outside the winning set of the dual game. To demonstrate the proposed ideas, we consider case studies from basic autonomous driving functionality, in particular, adaptive cruise control and lane keeping. We show how the proposed technique can be used to find interesting falsifying trajectories for classical control designs like proportional controllers, proportional integral controllers and model predictive controllers, as well as an open source real-world autonomous driving package.
Glen Chou, Yunus Emre Sahin, Liren Yang, Kwesi J. Rutledge, Petter Nilsson, Necmiye Ozay
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2