Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parsa Ghaffari
dblp:180/7211
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
aspect-based sentiment analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
neural text classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
review analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical bidirectional LSTM · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment AnalysisabstractOpinion mining from customer reviews has become pervasive in recent years.Sentences in reviews, however, are usually classified independently, even though they form part of a review's argumentative structure.Intuitively, sentences in a review build and elaborate upon each other; knowledge of the review structure and sentential context should thus inform the classification of each sentence.We demonstrate this hypothesis for the task of aspect-based sentiment analysis by modeling the interdependencies of sentences in a review with a hierarchical bidirectional LSTM.We show that the hierarchical model outperforms two non-hierarchical baselines, obtains results competitive with the state-of-the-art, and outperforms the state-of-the-art on five multilingual, multi-domain datasets without any handengineered features or external resources. Sebastian Ruder, Parsa Ghaffari, John G. Breslin |
EMNLP | 2 |