Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sina Radke

dblp:180/7778 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7844-2824ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 87% Human-AI interaction · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative virtual environments › social virtual reality
personal space
0.312018
Social VR: How Personal Space is Affected by Virtual Agents' Emotions · VR 2018
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative virtual environments
social virtual reality
0.312018
Social VR: How Personal Space is Affected by Virtual Agents' Emotions · VR 2018
Human-AI interaction
virtual agents
0.112018
Social VR: How Personal Space is Affected by Virtual Agents' Emotions · VR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physiological measurement · 0.3controlled experiment · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The Impact of a Virtual Agent's Non-Verbal Emotional Expression on a User's Personal Space Preferences
abstract
Virtual-reality-based interactions with virtual agents (VAs) are likely subject to similar influences as human-human interactions. In either real or virtual social interactions, interactants try to maintain their personal space (PS), an ubiquitous, situative, flexible safety zone. Building upon larger PS preferences to humans and VAs with angry facial expressions, we extend the investigations to whole-body emotional expressions. In two immersive settings-HMD and CAVE-66 males were approached by an either happy, angry, or neutral male VA. Subjects preferred a larger PS to the angry VA when being able to stop him at their convenience (Sample task), replicating previous findings, and when being able to actively avoid him (Pass By task). In the latter task, we also observed larger distances in the CAVE than in the HMD.
Andrea Bönsch, Sina Radke, Jonathan Ehret, Ute Habel, Torsten W. Kuhlen
IVA2
2018 Social VR: How Personal Space is Affected by Virtual Agents' Emotions
abstract
Personal space (PS), the flexible protective zone maintained around oneself, is a key element of everyday social interactions. It, e.g., affects people's interpersonal distance and is thus largely involved when navigating through social environments. However, the PS is regulated dynamically, its size depends on numerous social and personal characteristics and its violation evokes different levels of discomfort and physiological arousal. Thus, gaining more insight into this phenomenon is important. We contribute to the PS investigations by presenting the results of a controlled experiment in a CAVE, focusing on German males in the age of 18 to 30 years. The PS preferences of 27 participants have been sampled while they were approached by either a single embodied, computer-controlled virtual agent (VA) or by a group of three VAs. In order to investigate the influence of a VA's emotions, we altered their facial expression between angry and happy. Our results indicate that the emotion as well as the number of VAs approaching influence the PS: larger distances are chosen to angry VAs compared to happy ones; single VAs are allowed closer compared to the group. Thus, our study is a foundation for social and behavioral studies investigating PS preferences.
Andrea Bönsch, Sina Radke, Heiko Overath, Laura M. Asche, Jonathan Wendt, Tom Vierjahn, Ute Habel, Torsten W. Kuhlen
VR2