Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Neitz
dblp:180/8340
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 15% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
sequence-to-sequence model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Predicting Ordinary Differential Equations with Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
symbolic regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Predicting Ordinary Differential Equations with Transformers · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Direct Advantage Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function estimation
advantage estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Direct Advantage Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Direct Advantage Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
causal transfer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning explanations that are hard to vary · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning explanations that are hard to vary · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
teacher-student framework |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A teacher-student framework to distill future trajectories · ICLR 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A teacher-student framework to distill future trajectories · ICLR 2021 |
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive program synthesis
symbolic regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Symbolic Regression that scales · ICML 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamic modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Adaptive Skip Intervals: Temporal Abstraction for Recurrent Dynamical Models · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Adaptive Skip Intervals: Temporal Abstraction for Recurrent Dynamical Models · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
temporal abstraction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Adaptive Skip Intervals: Temporal Abstraction for Recurrent Dynamical Models · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 2.3pre-training · 2.3search · 1.0temporal difference learning · 0.6generalized advantage estimation · 0.6causal effect estimation · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.5knowledge distillation · 0.5causal structure learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Predicting Ordinary Differential Equations with TransformersabstractWe develop a transformer-based sequence-to-sequence model that recovers scalar ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in symbolic form from irregularly sampled and noisy observations of a single solution trajectory. We demonstrate in extensive empirical evaluations that our model performs better or on par with existing methods in terms of accurate recovery across various settings. Moreover, our method is efficiently scalable: after one-time pretraining on a large set of ODEs, we can infer the governing law of a new observed solution in a few forward passes of the model. Michal Klein, Alexander Neitz, Giambattista Parascandolo, Niki Kilbertus |
ICML | 3 |
| 2022 | Direct Advantage EstimationabstractThe predominant approach in reinforcement learning is to assign credit to actions based on the expected return. However, we show that the return may depend on the policy in a way which could lead to excessive variance in value estimation and slow down learning. Instead, we show that the advantage function can be interpreted as causal effects and shares similar properties with causal representations. Based on this insight, we propose Direct Advantage Estimation (DAE), a novel method that can model the advantage function and estimate it directly from on-policy data while simultaneously minimizing the variance of the return without requiring the (action-)value function. We also relate our method to Temporal Difference methods by showing how value functions can be seamlessly integrated into DAE. The proposed method is easy to implement and can be readily adapted by modern actor-critic methods. We evaluate DAE empirically on three discrete control domains and show that it can outperform generalized advantage estimation (GAE), a strong baseline for advantage estimation, on a majority of the environments when applied to policy optimization. Hsiao-Ru Pan, Nico Gürtler, Alexander Neitz, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learning
Ossama Ahmed, Frederik Träuble, Anirudh Goyal, Alexander Neitz, Manuel Wüthrich, Yoshua Bengio, Bernhard Schölkopf, Stefan Bauer |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | A teacher-student framework to distill future trajectories
Alexander Neitz, Giambattista Parascandolo, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning explanations that are hard to vary
Giambattista Parascandolo, Alexander Neitz, Antonio Orvieto, Luigi Gresele, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesabstractSymbolic equations are at the core of scientific discovery. The task of discovering the underlying equation from a set of input-output pairs is called symbolic regression. Traditionally, symbolic regression methods use hand-designed strategies that do not improve with experience. In this paper, we introduce the first symbolic regression method that leverages large scale pre-training. We procedurally generate an unbounded set of equations, and simultaneously pre-train a Transformer to predict the symbolic equation from a corresponding set of input-output-pairs. At test time, we query the model on a new set of points and use its output to guide the search for the equation. We show empirically that this approach can re-discover a set of well-known physical equations, and that it improves over time with more data and compute. Luca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi, Giambattista Parascandolo |
ICML | 3 |
| 2018 | Adaptive Skip Intervals: Temporal Abstraction for Recurrent Dynamical ModelsabstractWe introduce a method which enables a recurrent dynamics model to be temporally abstract. Our approach, which we call Adaptive Skip Intervals (ASI), is based on the observation that in many sequential prediction tasks, the exact time at which events occur is irrelevant to the underlying objective. Moreover, in many situations, there exist prediction intervals which result in particularly easy-to-predict transitions. We show that there are prediction tasks for which we gain both computational efficiency and prediction accuracy by allowing the model to make predictions at a sampling rate which it can choose itself. Alexander Neitz, Giambattista Parascandolo, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 1 |