EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ann-Katherin Eisfeld
dblp:180/9323
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | MuCor: mutation aggregation and correlation · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
database lookup · 0.2coverage measurement · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | High-dimensional genomic feature selection with the ordered stereotype logit modelabstractFor many high-dimensional genomic and epigenomic datasets, the outcome of interest is ordinal. While these ordinal outcomes are often thought of as the observed cutpoints of some latent continuous variable, some ordinal outcomes are truly discrete and are comprised of the subjective combination of several factors. The nonlinear stereotype logistic model, which does not assume proportional odds, was developed for these 'assessed' ordinal variables. It has previously been extended to the frequentist high-dimensional feature selection setting, but the Bayesian framework provides some distinct advantages in terms of simultaneous uncertainty quantification and variable selection. Here, we review the stereotype model and Bayesian variable selection methods and demonstrate how to combine them to select genomic features associated with discrete ordinal outcomes. We compared the Bayesian and frequentist methods in terms of variable selection performance. We additionally applied the Bayesian stereotype method to an acute myeloid leukemia RNA-sequencing dataset to further demonstrate its variable selection abilities by identifying features associated with the European LeukemiaNet prognostic risk score. Anna Eames Seffernick, Krzysztof Mrózek, Deedra Nicolet, Richard M. Stone, Ann-Katherin Eisfeld, John C. Byrd, Kellie J. Archer |
Briefings Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2016 | MuCor: mutation aggregation and correlationabstractMOTIVATION: There are many tools for variant calling and effect prediction, but little to tie together large sample groups. Aggregating, sorting and summarizing variants and effects across a cohort is often done with ad hoc scripts that must be re-written for every new project. In response, we have written MuCor, a tool to gather variants from a variety of input formats (including multiple files per sample), perform database lookups and frequency calculations, and write many types of reports. In addition to use in large studies with numerous samples, MuCor can also be employed to directly compare variant calls from the same sample across two or more platforms, parameters or pipelines. A companion utility, DepthGauge, measures coverage at regions of interest to increase confidence in calls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is freely available at https://github.com/blachlylab/mucor and a Docker image is available at https://hub.docker.com/r/blachlylab/mucor/ CONTACT: [email protected] data: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Karl W. Kroll, Ann-Katherin Eisfeld, Gerard Lozanski, Clara D. Bloomfield, John C. Byrd, James S. Blachly |
Bioinform. | 2 |