Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vikrant Singhal
dblp:181/0834
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-7819-7513ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
8 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 43% Algorithms and data structures · 20% Computational complexity · 15% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 56% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% Trustworthy machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
4.1 | 8 | 2023 | Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression · NeurIPS 2023 Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2022 New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma · NeurIPS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private statistical estimation |
2.1 | 4 | 2022 | Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2022 New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma · NeurIPS 2022 A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2022 New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
sample compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private statistical estimation
private distribution learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model |
0.6 | 2 | 2023 | Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians · NeurIPS 2019 Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › signal processing › information embedding
fingerprints |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma · NeurIPS 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Privately Learning Subspaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory › system identification
subspace identification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Privately Learning Subspaces · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
heavy-tailed distribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private statistical estimation
private mean estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
differentially private learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Deterministic and probabilistic binary search in graphs · STOC 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians · COLT 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 3.5sample compression scheme · 1.3list learning · 1.3public data augmentation · 1.1private assouad method · 1.1polynomial-time estimator · 1.1fingerprinting lemma · 1.1differentially private preconditioning · 1.1minimax analysis · 0.9sample complexity analysis · 0.4recursive private preconditioning · 0.4achlioptas-mcsherry algorithm · 0.4probabilistic analysis · 0.2competitive analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Uniformity Testing Under User-Level Local PrivacyabstractWe initiate the study of distribution testing under \emph{user-level} local differential privacy, where each of $n$ users contributes $m$ samples from the unknown underlying distribution. This setting, albeit very natural, is significantly more challenging that the usual locally private setting, as for the same parameter $\varepsilon$ the privacy guarantee must now apply to a full batch of $m$ data points. While some recent work consider distribution \emph{learning} in this user-level setting, nothing was known for even the most fundamental testing task, uniformity testing (and its generalization, identity testing). We address this gap, by providing (nearly) sample-optimal user-level LDP algorithms for uniformity and identity testing. Motivated by practical considerations, our main focus is on the private-coin, symmetric setting, which does not require users to share a common random seed nor to have been assigned a globally unique identifier. Clément L. Canonne, Abigail Gentle, Vikrant Singhal |
ITCS | 3 |
| 2024 | Not All Learnable Distribution Classes are Privately LearnableabstractWe give an example of a class of distributions that is learnable in total variation distance with a finite number of samples, but not learnable under $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy. This refutes a conjecture of Ashtiani. Mark Bun, Gautam Kamath 0001, Argyris Mouzakis, Vikrant Singhal |
ALT | 4 |
| 2024 | A Polynomial Time, Pure Differentially Private Estimator for Binary Product DistributionsabstractWe present the first $\varepsilon$-differentially private, computationally efficient algorithm that estimates the means of product distributions over $\{0,1\}^d$ accurately in total-variation distance, whilst attaining the optimal sample complexity to within polylogarithmic factors. The prior work had either solved this problem efficiently and optimally under weaker notions of privacy, or had solved it optimally while having exponential running times. Vikrant Singhal |
ALT | 1 |
| 2023 | Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample CompressionabstractWe study the problem of private distribution learning with access to public data. In this setup, which we refer to as *public-private learning*, the learner is given public and private samples drawn from an unknown distribution $p$ belonging to a class $\mathcal Q$, with the goal of outputting an estimate of $p$ while adhering to privacy constraints (here, pure differential privacy) only with respect to the private samples.
We show that the public-private learnability of a class $\mathcal Q$ is connected to the existence of a sample compression scheme for $\mathcal Q$, as well as to an intermediate notion we refer to as \emph{list learning}. Leveraging this connection: (1) approximately recovers previous results on Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$; and (2) leads to new ones, including sample complexity upper bounds for arbitrary $k$-mixtures of Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$, results for agnostic and distribution-shift resistant learners, as well as closure properties for public-private learnability under taking mixtures and products of distributions. Finally, via the connection to list learning, we show that for Gaussians in $\mathbb R^d$, at least $d$ public samples are necessary for private learnability, which is close to the known upper bound of $d+1$ public samples. Shai Ben-David, Alex Bie, Clément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath 0001, Vikrant Singhal |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded GaussiansabstractWe give the first polynomial-time, polynomial-sample, differentially private estimator for the mean and covariance of an arbitrary Gaussian distribution $N(\mu,\Sigma)$ in $\R^d$. All previous estimators are either nonconstructive, with unbounded running time, or require the user to specify a priori bounds on the parameters $\mu$ and $\Sigma$. The primary new technical tool in our algorithm is a new differentially private preconditioner that takes samples from an arbitrary Gaussian $N(0,\Sigma)$ and returns a matrix $A$ such that $A \Sigma A^T$ has constant condition number Gautam Kamath 0001, Argyris Mouzakis, Vikrant Singhal, Thomas Steinke 0002, Jonathan R. Ullman |
COLT | 3 |
| 2022 | New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting LemmaabstractWe prove new lower bounds for statistical estimation tasks under the constraint of $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy. First, we provide tight lower bounds for private covariance estimation of Gaussian distributions. We show that estimating the covariance matrix in Frobenius norm requires $\Omega(d^2)$ samples, and in spectral norm requires $\Omega(d^{3/2})$ samples, both matching upper bounds up to logarithmic factors. We prove these bounds via our main technical contribution, a broad generalization of the fingerprinting method to exponential families. Additionally, using the private Assouad method of Acharya, Sun, and Zhang, we show a tight $\Omega(d/(\alpha^2 \varepsilon))$ lower bound for estimating the mean of a distribution with bounded covariance to $\alpha$-error in $\ell_2$-distance. Prior known lower bounds for all these problems were either polynomially weaker or held under the stricter condition of $(\varepsilon,0)$-differential privacy. Gautam Kamath 0001, Argyris Mouzakis, Vikrant Singhal |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Private Estimation with Public DataabstractWe initiate the study of differentially private (DP) estimation with access to a small amount of public data. For private estimation of $d$-dimensional Gaussians, we assume that the public data comes from a Gaussian that may have vanishing similarity in total variation distance with the underlying Gaussian of the private data. We show that under the constraints of pure or concentrated DP, $d+1$ public data samples are sufficient to remove any dependence on the range parameters of the private data distribution from the private sample complexity, which is known to be otherwise necessary without public data. For separated Gaussian mixtures, we assume that the underlying public and private distributions are the same, and we consider two settings: (1) when given a dimension-independent amount of public data, the private sample complexity can be improved polynomially in terms of the number of mixture components, and any dependence on the range parameters of the distribution can be removed in the approximate DP case; (2) when given an amount of public data linear in the dimension, the private sample complexity can be made independent of range parameters even under concentrated DP, and additional improvements can be made to the overall sample complexity. Alex Bie, Gautam Kamath 0001, Vikrant Singhal |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Privately Learning SubspacesabstractPrivate data analysis suffers a costly curse of dimensionality. However, the data often has an underlying low-dimensional structure. For example, when optimizing via gradient descent, the gradients often lie in or near a low-dimensional subspace. If that low-dimensional structure can be identified, then we can avoid paying (in terms of privacy or accuracy) for the high ambient dimension. We present differentially private algorithms that take input data sampled from a low-dimensional linear subspace (possibly with a small amount of error) and output that subspace (or an approximation to it). These algorithms can serve as a pre-processing step for other procedures. Vikrant Singhal, Thomas Steinke 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed DistributionsabstractWe give new upper and lower bounds on the minimax sample complexity of differentially private mean estimation of distributions with bounded $k$-th moments. Roughly speaking, in the univariate case, we show that $$n = \Theta\left(\frac{1}{\alpha^2} + \frac{1}{\alpha^{\frac{k}{k-1}}\varepsilon}\right)$$ samples are necessary and sufficient to estimate the mean to $\alpha$-accuracy under $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, or any of its common relaxations. This result demonstrates a qualitatively different behavior compared to estimation absent privacy constraints, for which the sample complexity is identical for all $k \geq 2$. We also give algorithms for the multivariate setting whose sample complexity is a factor of $O(d)$ larger than the univariate case. Gautam Kamath 0001, Vikrant Singhal, Jonathan R. Ullman |
COLT | 2 |
| 2019 | Privately Learning High-Dimensional DistributionsabstractWe present novel, computationally efficient, and differentially private algorithms for two fundamental high-dimensional learning problems: learning a multivariate Gaussian and learning a product distribution over the Boolean hypercube in total variation distance. The sample complexity of our algorithms nearly matches the sample complexity of the optimal non-private learners for these tasks in a wide range of parameters, showing that privacy comes essentially for free for these problems. In particular, in contrast to previous approaches, our algorithm for learning Gaussians does not require strong a priori bounds on the range of the parameters. Our algorithms introduce a novel technical approach to reducing the sensitivity of the estimation procedure that we call recursive private preconditioning. Gautam Kamath 0001, Jerry Li 0001, Vikrant Singhal, Jonathan R. Ullman |
COLT | 3 |
| 2019 | Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated GaussiansabstractLearning the parameters of Gaussian mixture models is a fundamental and widely studied problem with numerous applications. In this work, we give new algorithms for learning the parameters of a high-dimensional, well separated, Gaussian mixture model subject to the strong constraint of differential privacy. In particular, we give a differentially private analogue of the algorithm of Achlioptas and McSherry. Our algorithm has two key properties not achieved by prior work: (1) The algorithm’s sample complexity matches that of the corresponding non-private algorithm up to lower order terms in a wide range of parameters. (2) The algorithm requires very weak a priori bounds on the parameters of the mixture components. Gautam Kamath 0001, Or Sheffet, Vikrant Singhal, Jonathan R. Ullman |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Deterministic and probabilistic binary search in graphsabstractWe consider the following natural generalization of Binary Search: in a given undirected, positively weighted graph, one vertex is a target. The algorithm’s task is to identify the target by adaptively querying vertices. In response to querying a node q, the algorithm learns either that q is the target, or is given an edge out of q that lies on a shortest path from q to the target. We study this problem in a general noisy model in which each query independently receives a correct answer with probability p > 1/2 (a known constant), and an (adversarial) incorrect one with probability 1 − p. Ehsan Emamjomeh-Zadeh, David Kempe 0001, Vikrant Singhal |
STOC | 3 |