Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dilip A. Durai

dblp:181/1329 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
de bruijn graph
0.312018
In silico read normalization using set multi-cover optimization · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.312018
In silico read normalization using set multi-cover optimization · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › transcript assembly
de novo transcriptome assembly
0.212016
Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
k-mer sampling
0.212016
Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
transcriptome assembly
0.212016
Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

set multi-cover optimization · 0.3heuristic algorithm · 0.3model fitting · 0.2de bruijn graph · 0.2clustering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 In silico read normalization using set multi-cover optimization
abstract
Motivation: De Bruijn graphs are a common assembly data structure for sequencing datasets. But with the advances in sequencing technologies, assembling high coverage datasets has become a computational challenge. Read normalization, which removes redundancy in datasets, is widely applied to reduce resource requirements. Current normalization algorithms, though efficient, provide no guarantee to preserve important k-mers that form connections between regions in the graph. Results: Here, normalization is phrased as a set multi-cover problem on reads and a heuristic algorithm, Optimized Read Normalization Algorithm (ORNA), is proposed. ORNA normalizes to the minimum number of reads required to retain all k-mers and their relative k-mer abundances from the original dataset. Hence, all connections from the original graph are preserved. ORNA was tested on various RNA-seq datasets with different coverage values. It was compared to the current normalization algorithms and was found to be performing better. Normalizing error corrected data allows for more accurate assemblies compared to the normalized uncorrected dataset. Further, an application is proposed in which multiple datasets are combined and normalized to predict novel transcripts that would have been missed otherwise. Finally, ORNA is a general purpose normalization algorithm that is fast and significantly reduces datasets with loss of assembly quality in between [1, 30]% depending on reduction stringency. Availability and implementation: ORNA is available at https://github.com/SchulzLab/ORNA. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Dilip A. Durai, Marcel H. Schulz
Bioinform.1
2016 Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly
abstract
MOTIVATION: De novo transcriptome assembly is an integral part for many RNA-seq workflows. Common applications include sequencing of non-model organisms, cancer or meta transcriptomes. Most de novo transcriptome assemblers use the de Bruijn graph (DBG) as the underlying data structure. The quality of the assemblies produced by such assemblers is highly influenced by the exact word length k As such no single kmer value leads to optimal results. Instead, DBGs over different kmer values are built and the assemblies are merged to improve sensitivity. However, no studies have investigated thoroughly the problem of automatically learning at which kmer value to stop the assembly. Instead a suboptimal selection of kmer values is often used in practice. RESULTS: Here we investigate the contribution of a single kmer value in a multi-kmer based assembly approach. We find that a comparative clustering of related assemblies can be used to estimate the importance of an additional kmer assembly. Using a model fit based algorithm we predict the kmer value at which no further assemblies are necessary. Our approach is tested with different de novo assemblers for datasets with different coverage values and read lengths. Further, we suggest a simple post processing step that significantly improves the quality of multi-kmer assemblies. CONCLUSION: We provide an automatic method for limiting the number of kmer values without a significant loss in assembly quality but with savings in assembly time. This is a step forward to making multi-kmer methods more reliable and easier to use. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A general implementation of our approach can be found under: https://github.com/SchulzLab/KREATIONSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. CONTACT: [email protected].
Dilip A. Durai, Marcel H. Schulz
Bioinform.1