Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Staber

dblp:181/2793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.912025
Scalable and adaptive prediction bands with kernel sum-of-squares · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.912025
Scalable and adaptive prediction bands with kernel sum-of-squares · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.712023
MMGP: a Mesh Morphing Gaussian Process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under nonparametrized geometrical variability · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence measure
kernel stein discrepancy
0.712023
Kernel Stein Discrepancy thinning: a theoretical perspective of pathologies and a practical fix with regularization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.712023
Kernel Stein Discrepancy thinning: a theoretical perspective of pathologies and a practical fix with regularization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.712023
MMGP: a Mesh Morphing Gaussian Process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under nonparametrized geometrical variability · NeurIPS 2023
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling
0.712023
MMGP: a Mesh Morphing Gaussian Process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under nonparametrized geometrical variability · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gaussian process · 1.3dimensionality reduction · 1.3representer theorem · 0.9hilbert-schmidt independence criterion · 0.9accelerated gradient method · 0.9regularization · 0.7kernel methods · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning signals defined on graphs with optimal transport and Gaussian process regression
abstract
In computational physics, machine learning has now emerged as a powerful complementary tool to explore efficiently candidate designs in engineering studies. Outputs in such supervised problems are signals defined on meshes, and a natural question is the extension of general scalar output regression models to such complex outputs. Changes between input geometries in terms of both size and adjacency structure in particular make this transition non-trivial. In this work, we propose an innovative strategy for Gaussian process regression where inputs are large and sparse graphs with continuous node attributes and outputs are signals defined on the nodes of the associated inputs. The methodology relies on the combination of regularized optimal transport, dimension reduction techniques, and the use of Gaussian processes indexed by graphs. In addition to enabling signal prediction, the main point of our proposal is to come with confidence intervals on node values, which is crucial for uncertainty quantification and active learning. Numerical experiments highlight the efficiency of the method to solve real problems in fluid dynamics and solid mechanics.
Raphaël Carpintero Perez, Sébastien Da Veiga, Josselin Garnier, Brian Staber
AISTATS4
2025 Scalable and adaptive prediction bands with kernel sum-of-squares
abstract
Conformal Prediction (CP) is a popular framework for constructing prediction bands with valid coverage in finite samples, while being free of any distributional assumption. A well-known limitation of conformal prediction is the lack of adaptivity, although several works introduced practically efficient alternate procedures. In this work, we build upon recent ideas that rely on recasting the CP problem as a statistical learning problem, directly targeting coverage and adaptivity. This statistical learning problem is based on reproducible kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) and kernel sum-of-squares (SoS) methods. First, we extend previous results with a general representer theorem and exhibit the dual formulation of the learning problem. Crucially, such dual formulation can be solved efficiently by accelerated gradient methods with several hundreds or thousands of samples, unlike previous strategies based on off-the-shelf semidefinite programming algorithms. Second, we introduce a new hyperparameter tuning strategy tailored specifically to target adaptivity through bounds on test-conditional coverage. This strategy, based on the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), is introduced here to tune kernel lengthscales in our framework, but has broader applicability since it could be used in any CP algorithm where the score function is learned. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted to show how our method compares to related work. All figures can be reproduced with the accompanying code at https://www.gitlab.com/drti/ksos-bands.
Louis Allain, Sébastien Da Veiga, Brian Staber
NeurIPS3
2024 Gaussian process regression with Sliced Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman graph kernels
abstract
Supervised learning has recently garnered significant attention in the field of computational physics due to its ability to effectively extract complex patterns for tasks like solving partial differential equations, or predicting material properties. Traditionally, such datasets consist of inputs given as meshes with a large number of nodes representing the problem geometry (seen as graphs), and corresponding outputs obtained with a numerical solver. This means the supervised learning model must be able to handle large and sparse graphs with continuous node attributes. In this work, we focus on Gaussian process regression, for which we introduce the Sliced Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman (SWWL) graph kernel. In contrast to existing graph kernels, the proposed SWWL kernel enjoys positive definiteness and a drastic complexity reduction, which makes it possible to process datasets that were previously impossible to handle. The new kernel is first validated on graph classification for molecular datasets, where the input graphs have a few tens of nodes. The efficiency of the SWWL kernel is then illustrated on graph regression in computational fluid dynamics and solid mechanics, where the input graphs are made up of tens of thousands of nodes.
Raphaël Carpintero Perez, Sébastien Da Veiga, Josselin Garnier, Brian Staber
AISTATS4
2023 Kernel Stein Discrepancy thinning: a theoretical perspective of pathologies and a practical fix with regularization
abstract
Stein thinning is a promising algorithm proposed by (Riabiz et al., 2022) for post-processing outputs of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The main principle is to greedily minimize the kernelized Stein discrepancy (KSD), which only requires the gradient of the log-target distribution, and is thus well-suited for Bayesian inference. The main advantages of Stein thinning are the automatic remove of the burn-in period, the correction of the bias introduced by recent MCMC algorithms, and the asymptotic properties of convergence towards the target distribution. Nevertheless, Stein thinning suffers from several empirical pathologies, which may result in poor approximations, as observed in the literature. In this article, we conduct a theoretical analysis of these pathologies, to clearly identify the mechanisms at stake, and suggest improved strategies. Then, we introduce the regularized Stein thinning algorithm to alleviate the identified pathologies. Finally, theoretical guarantees and extensive experiments show the high efficiency of the proposed algorithm. An implementation of regularized Stein thinning as the kernax library in python and JAX is available at https://gitlab.com/drti/kernax.
Clément Bénard, Brian Staber, Sébastien Da Veiga
NeurIPS2
2023 MMGP: a Mesh Morphing Gaussian Process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under nonparametrized geometrical variability
abstract
When learning simulations for modeling physical phenomena in industrial designs, geometrical variabilities are of prime interest. While classical regression techniques prove effective for parameterized geometries, practical scenarios often involve the absence of shape parametrization during the inference stage, leaving us with only mesh discretizations as available data. Learning simulations from such mesh-based representations poses significant challenges, with recent advances relying heavily on deep graph neural networks to overcome the limitations of conventional machine learning approaches. Despite their promising results, graph neural networks exhibit certain drawbacks, including their dependency on extensive datasets and limitations in providing built-in predictive uncertainties or handling large meshes. In this work, we propose a machine learning method that do not rely on graph neural networks. Complex geometrical shapes and variations with fixed topology are dealt with using well-known mesh morphing onto a common support, combined with classical dimensionality reduction techniques and Gaussian processes. The proposed methodology can easily deal with large meshes without the need for explicit shape parameterization and provides crucial predictive uncertainties, which are essential for informed decision-making. In the considered numerical experiments, the proposed method is competitive with respect to existing graph neural networks, regarding training efficiency and accuracy of the predictions.
Fabien Casenave, Brian Staber, Xavier Roynard
NeurIPS2