Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. Seeger

dblp:181/3132 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › system identification › robot dynamics identification
friction identification
0.011989
Estimation of rigid body models for a six-axis manipulator with geared electric drives · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics
0.011989
Estimation of rigid body models for a six-axis manipulator with geared electric drives · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-pass filtering · 0.0least-squares parameter estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Estimation of rigid body models for a six-axis manipulator with geared electric drives
abstract
Several practical approaches to estimate the link inertia, gravity loading, and friction coefficients of a manipulator are discussed. All of the methods have been experimentally evaluated on a six-axis robot with conventional geared electric drives. The results show that it is possible to estimate the parameters of a linearized or nonlinear rigid-body model with only a few percent error in spite of quantization effects, highly nonlinear friction and unmodeled elasticity and backslash. Keys to successful parameter estimation in this case are careful choice of test motions, low-pass filtering of the data, and reduction of the model to the truly significant parameters. It has been demonstrated that a good match between measured torques and those predicted from the model for a certain test motion is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a good model. A model that has too many parameters with respect to the test motions considered may give a good match but perform poorly in regions of the workspace where no data were collected for the estimation.>
G. Seeger, Werner Leonhard
ICRA1