Joseph Dionise

dblp:181/3236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 79% Robot manipulation · 16% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 4%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot calibration
manipulator calibration
0.011990
Getting to know your robot · ICRA 1990
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
manipulator control
0.011990
A world model based approach to manipulator control · ICRA 1990
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot calibration
0.011990
Getting to know your robot · ICRA 1990
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control
0.011989
Adaptive coordinated motion control of two manipulator arms · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
coordinated motion control
0.011989
Adaptive coordinated motion control of two manipulator arms · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.011989
Adaptive coordinated motion control of two manipulator arms · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
multi-arm manipulation
0.011989
Adaptive coordinated motion control of two manipulator arms · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation
industrial robot
0.011990
Getting to know your robot · ICRA 1990
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.011990
A world model based approach to manipulator control · ICRA 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

position sensor calibration · 0.0null task · 0.0motor torque constant estimation · 0.0friction coefficient estimation · 0.0dynamic world model · 0.0newton-euler inverse dynamics · 0.0adaptive control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 A world model based approach to manipulator control
abstract
A dynamic world model is presented on which all planning, sensing, and control functions are based. A planning system that specifies how tasks are to be performed and the method used for sensing the state of the task are presented. The objectives of the control law and the algorithm used in the controller are given. Practical considerations are addressed, and some important details, such as the use of the null task, are explained. An example task of opening a door is examined.>
Michael W. Walker, Joseph Dionise
ICRA2
1990 Getting to know your robot
abstract
Several algorithms used for the calibration of a manipulator are presented. The calibration includes the estimation of friction coefficients, position sensor calibration, and the motor torque constants. The model used for compensation of the gearing effects is described. The results of application of these algorithms to the PUMA 560 manipulator are presented.>
Michael W. Walker, Al Dobryden, Joseph Dionise
ICRA3
1989 Adaptive coordinated motion control of two manipulator arms
abstract
An adaptive controller is presented for the coordinated motion control of two manipulators handling an object of unknown mass. Global convergence in tracking of both position and internal force trajectories of the object is proved, assuming perfect models for both manipulators. The computational algorithm is similar to the Newton-Euler inverse dynamics algorithm with complexity linear in the number of links in the manipulators. A significant feature of the control method is that both manipulators use the identical computational algorithm. Thus, the concept of master/slave relationship between the two manipulators is avoided. Two simulations are presented. The first assumes an ideal model for each manipulator. As expected, the controller is stable and provides excellent tracking ability of the manipulator. The second simulation investigates the effects of modeling errors in the mass properties of each arm. The position trajectories track very close to their desired values; however, they never completely converge.>
Michael W. Walker, Joseph Dionise
ICRA3