Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher K. Chow

dblp:181/3913 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0009-0001-5039-6723ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 44% Vision and language · 44% 3D vision · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.212016
Fusing LIDAR and images for pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks · ICRA 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection
0.212016
Fusing LIDAR and images for pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks · ICRA 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth image analysis
depth map representation
0.112016
Fusing LIDAR and images for pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks · ICRA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

region-CNN · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2HHA encoding · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Fusing LIDAR and images for pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks
abstract
In this paper, we explore various aspects of fusing LIDAR and color imagery for pedestrian detection in the context of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have recently become state-of-art for many vision problems. We incorporate LIDAR by up-sampling the point cloud to a dense depth map and then extracting three features representing different aspects of the 3D scene. We then use those features as extra image channels. Specifically, we leverage recent work on HHA [9] (horizontal disparity, height above ground, and angle) representations, adapting the code to work on up-sampled LIDAR rather than Microsoft Kinect depth maps. We show, for the first time, that such a representation is applicable to up-sampled LIDAR data, despite its sparsity. Since CNNs learn a deep hierarchy of feature representations, we then explore the question: At what level of representation should we fuse this additional information with the original RGB image channels? We use the KITTI pedestrian detection dataset for our exploration. We first replicate the finding that region-CNNs (R-CNNs) [8] can outperform the original proposal mechanism using only RGB images, but only if fine-tuning is employed. Then, we show that: 1) using HHA features and RGB images performs better than RGB-only, even without any fine-tuning using large RGB web data, 2) fusing RGB and HHA achieves the strongest results if done late, but, under a parameter or computational budget, is best done at the early to middle layers of the hierarchical representation, which tend to represent midlevel features rather than low (e.g. edges) or high (e.g. object class decision) level features, 3) some of the less successful methods have the most parameters, indicating that increased classification accuracy is not simply a function of increased capacity in the neural network.
Joel Schlosser, Christopher K. Chow, Zsolt Kira
ICRA2