Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luke Cramphorn
dblp:181/4161
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-1722-5903ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot manipulation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Voronoi Features for Tactile Sensing: Direct Inference of Pressure, Shear, and Contact Locations · ICRA 2018 Tactile manipulation with biomimetic active touch · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › contact sensing
contact localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Voronoi Features for Tactile Sensing: Direct Inference of Pressure, Shear, and Contact Locations · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Voronoi Features for Tactile Sensing: Direct Inference of Pressure, Shear, and Contact Locations · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › dexterous manipulation
tactile manipulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tactile manipulation with biomimetic active touch · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing
tactile perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Tactile manipulation with biomimetic active touch · ICRA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voronoi tessellation · 0.3tactile transduction · 0.3cross-validation · 0.2biomimetic tactile sensor · 0.2bayesian perception · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Voronoi Features for Tactile Sensing: Direct Inference of Pressure, Shear, and Contact LocationsabstractThere are a wide range of features that tactile contact provides, each with different aspects of information that can be used for object grasping, manipulation, and perception. In this paper inference of some key tactile features, tip displacement, contact location, shear direction and magnitude, is demonstrated by introducing a novel method of transducing a third dimension to the sensor data via Voronoi tessellation. The inferred features are displayed throughout the work in a new visualisation mode derived from the Voronoi tessellation; these visualisations create easier interpretation of data from an optical tactile sensor that measures local shear from displacement of internal pins (the TacTip). The output values of tip displacement and shear magnitude are calibrated to appropriate mechanical units and validate the direction of shear inferred from the sensor. We show that these methods can infer the direction of shear to ~2.3° without the need for training a classifier or regressor. The approach demonstrated here will increase the versatility and generality of the sensors and thus allow sensor to be used in more unstructured and unknown environments, as well as improve the use of these tactile sensors in more complex systems such as robot hands. Luke Cramphorn, John Lloyd, Nathan F. Lepora |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2018 | TacWhiskers: Biomimetic Optical Tactile Whiskered RobotsabstractHere we propose and investigate a novel vibrissal tactile sensor - the Tac Whisker array - based on modifying a 3D-printed optical cutaneous (fingertip) tactile sensor - the TacTip. Two versions are considered: a static Tac Whisker array analogous to immotile tactile vibrissae (e.g. rodent microvib-rissae) and a dynamic Tac Whisker array analogous to motile tactile vibrissae (e.g. rodent macrovibrissae). Performance is assessed on an active object localization task. The whisking motion of the dynamic Tac Whisker leads to millimetre-scale location perception, whereas perception with the static Tac Whisker array is relatively poor when making dabbing contacts. The dynamic sensor output is dominated by a self-generated motion signal, which can be compensated by comparing to a reference signal. Overall, the Tac Whisker arrays give a new class of tactile whiskered robots that benefit from being relatively inexpensive and customizable. Furthermore, the biomimetic basis for the Tac Whiskers fits well with building an embodied model of the rodent sensory system for investigating animal perception. Nathan F. Lepora, Martin J. Pearson, Luke Cramphorn |
IROS | 3 |
| 2016 | Tactile manipulation with biomimetic active touchabstractTactile manipulation is the ability to control objects in real-time using the sense of touch. Here we examine tactile manipulation from the perspective of active touch with a biomimetic tactile sensor, which combines tactile perception with control of sensor location. Experiments are performed with the tactile fingertip mounted as end effector to a robot arm, to manipulate (roll) a cylinder in contact with the fingertip. Performance is validated with offline (cross-validation) and online (real-time operation) assessments. Location perception is finer than the sensor resolution, leading to superresolved tactile manipulation along a complex trajectory. However, the original methods were non-robust to large unknown disturbances of object location, necessitating modification of the perceptual process to diminish prior beliefs relative to past posterior beliefs. In consequence robust and accurate tactile manipulation was attained. In general, it appears there is a trade-off between the responsiveness to unknown change and manipulation accuracy, which must be set appropriately for each task. Luke Cramphorn, Benjamin Ward-Cherrier, Nathan F. Lepora |
ICRA | 1 |