EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marius Stücheli
dblp:181/4185
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
robot joint design |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Work density analysis of adjustable stiffness mechanisms · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design
variable stiffness |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Work density analysis of adjustable stiffness mechanisms · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › mechanical design
compliant mechanism design |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Work density analysis of adjustable stiffness mechanisms · ICRA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Work density analysis of adjustable stiffness mechanismsabstractMechanical compliance is important for a robust and safe physical interaction of robots with humans and unstructured environments. Using adjustable stiffness, the advantages of compliant and stiff systems can be combined and thus the versatility of a robot increased. The realisation of adjustable stiffness in robot joints through compliant mechanisms shows several advantages over active control approaches, especially in terms of robustness. The compactness of adjustable stiffness mechanisms (ASMs) is important for their integration in robotic systems. An important aspect of compactness in ASMs is the storable work per volume, i.e. the work density. Therefore we propose a set of benchmarks to analyse the work density of elastic mechanisms on different design levels. The application of these benchmarks is demonstrated on a novel ASM, which is part of the adjustable impedance element AIE Uno, and on DLR's FSJ. The analysis of these ASMs demonstrates the application and the benefit of the proposed benchmarks. The benchmarks support the choice between alternative solutions and the identification of improvement potential in an existing design. Marius Stücheli, Andre Foehr, Mirko Meboldt |
ICRA | 1 |