Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kirk P. Gardner

dblp:181/4631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5306-2174ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry › topological data analysis › persistent homology
persistence diagram
0.912025
A Theory of Sub-Barcodes · SoCG 2025
Computational geometry
topological data analysis
0.912025
A Theory of Sub-Barcodes · SoCG 2025
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.312017
When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017
Computational geometry
computational topology
0.312017
When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017
Visualization and visual analytics › information visualization › knowledge visualization
educational visualization
0.112016
Interactive Geometric Algorithm Visualization in a Browser · SoCG 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

functorial analysis · 0.9category theory · 0.9homology · 0.6simplicial complexes · 0.3simplicial complex · 0.3p5.js · 0.2javascript · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Theory of Sub-Barcodes
abstract
From the work of Bauer and Lesnick, it is known that there is no functor from the category of pointwise finite-dimensional persistence modules to the category of barcodes and overlap matchings. In this work, we introduce sub-barcodes and show that there is a functor from the category of factorizations of persistence module homomorphisms to a poset of barcodes ordered by the sub-barcode relation. Sub-barcodes and factorizations provide a looser alternative to bottleneck matchings and interleavings that can give strong guarantees in a number of settings that arise naturally in topological data analysis. The main use of sub-barcodes is to make strong claims about an unknown barcode in the absence of an interleaving. For example, given only upper and lower bounds $g\geq f\geq \ell$ of an unknown real-valued function $f$, a sub-barcode associated with $f$ can be constructed from $\ell$ and $g$ alone. We propose a theory of sub-barcodes and observe that the subobjects in the category of functors from intervals to matchings naturally correspond to sub-barcodes.
Oliver A. Chubet, Kirk P. Gardner, Don Sheehy
SoCG2
2017 When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works
abstract
In their seminal work on homological sensor networks, de Silva and Ghrist showed the surprising fact that it's possible to certify the coverage of a coordinate-free sensor network even with very minimal knowledge of the space to be covered. Here, coverage means that every point in the domain (except possibly those very near the boundary) has a nearby sensor. More generally, their algorithm takes a pair of nested neighborhood graphs along with a labeling of vertices as either boundary or interior and computes the relative homology of a simplicial complex induced by the graphs. This approach, called the Topological Coverage Criterion (TCC), requires some assumptions about the underlying geometric domain as well as some assumptions about the relationship of the input graphs to the domain. The goal of this paper is to generalize these assumptions and show how the TCC can be applied to both much more general domains as well as very weak assumptions on the input. We give a new, simpler proof of the de Silva-Ghrist Topological Coverage Criterion that eliminates any assumptions about the smoothness of the boundary of the underlying space, allowing the results to be applied to much more general problems. The new proof factors the geometric, topological, and combinatorial aspects, allowing us to provide a coverage condition that supports thick boundaries, k-coverage, and weighted coverage, in which sensors have varying radii.
Nicholas J. Cavanna, Kirk P. Gardner, Don Sheehy
SODA2
2016 Interactive Geometric Algorithm Visualization in a Browser
abstract
We present an online, interactive tool for writing and presenting interactive geometry demos suitable for classroom demonstrations. Code for the demonstrations is written in JavaScript using p5.js, a JavaScript library based on Processing.
Kirk P. Gardner, Lynn Asselin, Don Sheehy
SoCG1