Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenna Song
dblp:181/4787
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3889-6466ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Systems and software security · 50% Web and mobile security · 44% Network security · 6% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Operating systems · 81% Software testing · 19% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › operating system security › mobile OS security
android sandboxing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based Virtualization · CCS 2021 |
Web and mobile security › mobile security
android security |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | App's Auto-Login Function Security Testing via Android OS-Level Virtualization · ICSE 2021 |
Systems and software security › operating system security
mobile OS security |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based Virtualization · CCS 2021 |
Web and mobile security
mobile security |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | App's Auto-Login Function Security Testing via Android OS-Level Virtualization · ICSE 2021 |
Operating systems
virtualization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based Virtualization · CCS 2021 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
anti-evasion |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based Virtualization · CCS 2021 |
Systems and software security
isolation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based Virtualization · CCS 2021 |
Operating systems › virtualization
OS-level virtualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | App's Auto-Login Function Security Testing via Android OS-Level Virtualization · ICSE 2021 |
Software testing › non-functional testing
security testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | App's Auto-Login Function Security Testing via Android OS-Level Virtualization · ICSE 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
device fingerprint simulation · 1.0container-based virtualization · 1.0OS-level virtualization · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Text-free inductive knowledge graph embedding via meta graph-based prompt learning
Zhiwen Xie, Guangyou Zhou, Wenna Song, Jimmy Huang 0001 |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 4 |
| 2024 | Security Research for Android Remote Assistance Apps
Xiaofeng Liu 0013, Wenna Song, Shanqing Guo |
ACISP (3) | 4 |
| 2021 | Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based VirtualizationabstractA fast-growing demand from smartphone users is mobile virtualization.This technique supports running separate instances of virtual phone environments on the same device. In this way, users can run multiple copies of the same app simultaneously,and they can also run an untrusted app in an isolated virtual phone without causing damages to other apps. Traditional hypervisor-based virtualization is impractical to resource-constrained mobile devices.Recent app-level virtualization efforts suffer from the weak isolation mechanism. In contrast, container-based virtualization offers an isolated virtual environment with superior performance.However, existing Android containers do not meet the anti-evasion requirement for security applications: their designs are inherently incapable of providing transparency or stealthiness. Wenna Song, Jiang Ming 0002, Xuanchen Pan, Jianming Fu, Guojun Peng |
CCS | 1 |
| 2021 | App's Auto-Login Function Security Testing via Android OS-Level VirtualizationabstractLimited by the small keyboard, most mobile apps support the automatic login feature for better user experience. Therefore, users avoid the inconvenience of retyping their ID and password when an app runs in the foreground again. However, this auto-login function can be exploited to launch the so-called "data-clone attack": once the locally-stored, auto-login depended data are cloned by attackers and placed into their own smartphones, attackers can break through the login-device number limit and log in to the victim's account stealthily. A natural countermeasure is to check the consistency of device-specific attributes. As long as the new device shows different device fingerprints with the previous one, the app will disable the auto-login function and thus prevent data-clone attacks. In this paper, we develop VPDroid, a transparent Android OS-level virtualization platform tailored for security testing. With VPDroid, security analysts can customize different device artifacts, such as CPU model, Android ID, and phone number, in a virtual phone without user-level API hooking. VPDroid's isolation mechanism ensures that user-mode apps in the virtual phone cannot detect device-specific discrepancies. To assess Android apps' susceptibility to the data-clone attack, we use VPDroid to simulate data-clone attacks with 234 most-downloaded apps. Our experiments on five different virtual phone environments show that VPDroid's device attribute customization can deceive all tested apps that perform device-consistency checks, such as Twitter, WeChat, and PayPal. 19 vendors have confirmed our report as a zero-day vulnerability. Our findings paint a cautionary tale: only enforcing a device-consistency check at client side is still vulnerable to an advanced data-clone attack. Wenna Song, Jiang Ming 0002, Han Yan 0013, Jianming Fu, Guojun Peng |
ICSE | 1 |