Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Uwe A. W. Piske
dblp:181/5121
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1963
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
matrix learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1963 | Learning Matrices and Their Applications · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum-likelihood decoding · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1963 | Learning Matrices and Their ApplicationsabstractThe paper gives a survey of the learning circuits which became known as learning matrices and some of their possible technological applications. The first section describes the principle of learning matrices. So-called conditioned connections between the characteristics of an object and the meaning of an object are formed in the learning phase. During the operation of connecting the characteristics of an object with its meaning (EB operation of the knowing phase) upon presenting the object characteristics, the associated most similar meaning is realized in the form of a signal by maximum likelihood decoding. Conversely, in operation from the meaning of an object to its characteristics (BE operation) the associated object characteristics are obtained as signals by parallel reading upon application of an object meaning. According to the characteristic signals processed (binary or analog signals) discrimination must be made between binary and nonbinary learning matrices. In the case of the binary learning matrix the conditioned connections are a statistical measure for the frequency of the coordination of object characteristics and object meaning, in the case of the nonbinary learning matrix they are a measure for an analog value proportional to a characteristic. Both types of matrices allow for the characteristic sets applied during EB operation to be unsystematically disturbed within limits. Moreover, the nonbinary learning matrix is invariant to systematic deviations between presented and learned characteristic sets (invariance to affine transformation, translation and rotated skewness). Karl Steinbuch, Uwe A. W. Piske |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 2 |