Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Avi Ben-Cohen
dblp:181/7012
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 Semantic Diversity Learning for Zero-Shot Multi-label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
asymmetric loss |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial annotation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
multi-label zero-shot learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Semantic Diversity Learning for Zero-Shot Multi-label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › cross-modal retrieval › image-text retrieval
tag-based image retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Semantic Diversity Learning for Zero-Shot Multi-label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic diversity learning · 1.0loss function · 1.0embedding matrix · 1.0temporary model for class distribution estimation · 0.6class-aware selective loss · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Planar-SfM: Camera Pose Estimation via Homography Graph Embeddings
Gabi Pragier, Matan Karklinsky, David Ungarish, Avi Ben-Cohen |
ICPR (3) | 4 |
| 2023 | ML-Decoder: Scalable and Versatile Classification HeadabstractIn this paper, we introduce ML-Decoder, a new attention-based classification head. ML-Decoder predicts the existence of class labels via queries, and enables better utilization of spatial data compared to global average pooling. By redesigning the decoder architecture, and using a novel group-decoding scheme, ML-Decoder is highly efficient, and can scale well to thousands of classes. Compared to using a larger backbone, ML-Decoder consistently provides a better speed-accuracy trade-off. ML-Decoder is also versatile - it can be used as a drop-in replacement for various classification heads, and generalize to unseen classes when operated with word queries. Novel query augmentations further improve its generalization ability. Using ML-Decoder, we achieve state-of-the-art results on several classification tasks: on MS-COCO multi-label, we reach 91.1% mAP; on NUS-WIDE zero-shot, we reach 31.1% ZSL mAP; and on ImageNet single-label, we reach with vanilla ResNet50 backbone a new top score of 80.7%, without extra data or distillation. Public code will be available. Tal Ridnik, Gilad Sharir, Avi Ben-Cohen, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Asaf Noy |
WACV | 3 |
| 2023 | The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)abstractIn this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094. Patrick Bilic, Patrick Ferdinand Christ, Hongwei Li 0004, Eugene Vorontsov, Avi Ben-Cohen, Georgios Kaissis, Adi Szeskin, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Gabriel Chartrand, Fabian Lohöfer, Julian Walter Holch, Wieland H. Sommer, Felix Hofmann, Alexandre Hostettler, Naama Lev-Cohain, Michal Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Refael Vivanti, Jacob Sosna, Ivan Ezhov, Anjany Sekuboyina, Fernando Navarro, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Suprosanna Shit, Xiaobin Hu, Jana Lipková, Markus Rempfler, Marie Piraud, Jan Kirschke, Benedikt Wiestler, Christian Hülsemeyer, Marcel Beetz, Florian Ettlinger, Michela Antonelli, Woong Bae, Miriam Bellver, Lei Bi 0001, Hao Chen 0011, Grzegorz Chlebus, Erik Dam, Qi Dou 0001, Chi-Wing Fu, Bogdan Georgescu, Xavier Giró-i-Nieto, Felix Grün, Xu Han 0009, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jürgen Hesser, Jan Hendrik Moltz, Christian Igel, Fabian Isensee, Paul F. Jaeger, Fucang Jia, Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva, Mahendra Khened, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Simon Kohl, Tomasz K. Konopczynski, Avinash Kori, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Xiaomeng Li 0001, John S. Lowengrub, Jun Ma 0016, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Hans Meine, Dorit Merhof, Akshay Pai, Mathias Perslev, Jens Petersen, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xiaojuan Qi 0001, Oliver Rippel, Karsten Roth, Ignacio Sarasua, Andrea Schenk, Zengming Shen, Jordi Torres, Christian Wachinger, Chunliang Wang, Leon Weninger, Daguang Xu, Xiaoping Yang 0001, Simon C. H. Yu, Yading Yuan, Miao Yue, Liping Zhang 0009, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Spyridon Bakas, Rickmer Braren, Volker Heinemann, Christopher Joseph Pal, An Tang, Samuel Kadoury, Luc Soler, Bram van Ginneken, Hayit Greenspan, Leo Joskowicz, Bjoern Menze |
Medical Image Anal. | 5 |
| 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective LossabstractLarge-scale multi-label classification datasets are commonly, and perhaps inevitably, partially annotated. That is, only a small subset of labels are annotated per sample. Different methods for handling the missing labels induce different properties on the model and impact its accuracy. In this work, we analyze the partial labeling problem, then propose a solution based on two key ideas. First, un-annotated labels should be treated selectively according to two probability quantities: the class distribution in the overall dataset and the specific label likelihood for a given data sample. We propose to estimate the class distribution using a dedicated temporary model, and we show its improved efficiency over a naive estimation computed using the dataset's partial annotations. Second, during the training of the target model, we emphasize the contribution of annotated labels over originally un-annotated labels by using a dedicated asymmetric loss. With our novel approach, we achieve state-of-the-art results on OpenImages dataset (e.g. reaching 87.3 mAP on V6). In addition, experiments conducted on LVIS and simulated-COCO demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Code is available at https://github.com/Alibaba-MIIL/PartialLabelingCSL. Emanuel Ben Baruch, Tal Ridnik, Itamar Friedman, Avi Ben-Cohen, Nadav Zamir, Asaf Noy, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | Semantic Diversity Learning for Zero-Shot Multi-label ClassificationabstractTraining a neural network model for recognizing multiple labels associated with an image, including identifying unseen labels, is challenging, especially for images that portray numerous semantically diverse labels. As challenging as this task is, it is an essential task to tackle since it represents many real-world cases, such as image retrieval of natural images. We argue that using a single embedding vector to represent an image, as commonly practiced, is not sufficient to rank both relevant seen and unseen labels accurately. This study introduces an end-to-end model training for multi-label zero-shot learning that supports the semantic diversity of the images and labels. We propose to use an embedding matrix having principal embedding vectors trained using a tailored loss function. In addition, during training, we suggest up-weighting in the loss function image samples presenting higher semantic diversity to encourage the diversity of the embedding matrix. Extensive experiments show that our proposed method improves the zero-shot model’s quality in tag-based image retrieval achieving SoTA results on several common datasets (NUS-Wide, COCO, Open Images). Avi Ben-Cohen, Nadav Zamir, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Itamar Friedman, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2020 | Compact Network Training for Person ReIDabstractThe task of person re-identification (ReID) has attracted growing attention in recent years leading to improved performance, albeit with little focus on real-world applications. Most SotA methods are based on heavy pre-trained models, e.g. ResNet50 (~25M parameters), which makes them less practical and more tedious to explore architecture modifications. In this study, we focus on a small-sized randomly initialized model that enables us to easily introduce architecture and training modifications suitable for person ReID. The outcomes of our study are a compact network and a fitting training regime. We show the robustness of the network by outperforming the SotA on both Market1501 and DukeMTMC. Furthermore, we show the representation power of our ReID network via SotA results on a different task of multi-object tracking. Hussam Lawen, Avi Ben-Cohen, Matan Protter, Itamar Friedman, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
ICMR | 2 |
| 2019 | Cross-modality synthesis from CT to PET using FCN and GAN networks for improved automated lesion detection
Avi Ben-Cohen, Eyal Klang, Stephen P. Raskin, Shelly Soffer, Simona Ben-Haim, Eli Konen, Michal Amitai, Hayit Greenspan |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2018 | Fully convolutional network and sparsity-based dictionary learning for liver lesion detection in CT examinations
Avi Ben-Cohen, Eyal Klang, Ariel Kerpel, Eli Konen, Michal Amitai, Hayit Greenspan |
Neurocomputing | 1 |