Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sven Gundlach
dblp:182/0178
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-4060-2754ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 68% Computational science and engineering · 32% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Integrating biological knowledge and gene expression data using pathway-guided random forests: a benchmarking study · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
omics data analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surrogate minimal depth as an importance measure for variables in random forests · Bioinform. 2019 |
Computational science and engineering › model selection
variable selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surrogate minimal depth as an importance measure for variables in random forests · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.8surrogate minimal depth · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Integrating biological knowledge and gene expression data using pathway-guided random forests: a benchmarking studyabstractMOTIVATION: High-throughput technologies allow comprehensive characterization of individuals on many molecular levels. However, training computational models to predict disease status based on omics data is challenging. A promising solution is the integration of external knowledge about structural and functional relationships into the modeling process. We compared four published random forest-based approaches using two simulation studies and nine experimental datasets. RESULTS: The self-sufficient prediction error approach should be applied when large numbers of relevant pathways are expected. The competing methods hunting and learner of functional enrichment should be used when low numbers of relevant pathways are expected or the most strongly associated pathways are of interest. The hybrid approach synthetic features is not recommended because of its high false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package providing functions for data analysis and simulation is available at GitHub (https://github.com/szymczak-lab/PathwayGuidedRF). An accompanying R data package (https://github.com/szymczak-lab/DataPathwayGuidedRF) stores the processed and quality controlled experimental datasets downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Stephan Seifert, Sven Gundlach, Olaf Junge, Silke Szymczak, Luigi Martelli |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | Surrogate minimal depth as an importance measure for variables in random forestsabstractMOTIVATION: It has been shown that the machine learning approach random forest can be successfully applied to omics data, such as gene expression data, for classification or regression and to select variables that are important for prediction. However, the complex relationships between predictor variables, in particular between causal predictor variables, make the interpretation of currently applied variable selection techniques difficult. RESULTS: Here we propose a new variable selection approach called surrogate minimal depth (SMD) that incorporates surrogate variables into the concept of minimal depth (MD) variable importance. Applying SMD, we show that simulated correlation patterns can be reconstructed and that the increased consideration of variable relationships improves variable selection. When compared with existing state-of-the-art methods and MD, SMD has higher empirical power to identify causal variables while the resulting variable lists are equally stable. In conclusion, SMD is a promising approach to get more insight into the complex interplay of predictor variables and outcome in a high-dimensional data setting. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/StephanSeifert/SurrogateMinimalDepth. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Stephan Seifert, Sven Gundlach, Silke Szymczak |
Bioinform. | 2 |