Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Metin Balaban
dblp:182/1980
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6947-5915ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Phylogenetic double placement of mixed samples · Bioinform. 2020 APPLES: Fast Distance-Based Phylogenetic Placement · RECOMB 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
phylogenetic placement |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Phylogenetic double placement of mixed samples · Bioinform. 2020 APPLES: Fast Distance-Based Phylogenetic Placement · RECOMB 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
somatic copy number alteration detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Phylogenetic double placement of mixed samples · Bioinform. 2020 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | APPLES: Fast Distance-Based Phylogenetic Placement · RECOMB 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distance-based phylogenetic placement · 0.8non-convex optimization · 0.4k-mer sets · 0.4jaccard index · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics
Cong Ma 0008, Metin Balaban, Jingxian Liu, Benjamin J. Raphael |
RECOMB | 2 |
| 2021 | Estimating repeat spectra and genome length from low-coverage genome skims with RESPECTabstractThe cost of sequencing the genome is dropping at a much faster rate compared to assembling and finishing the genome. The use of lightly sampled genomes (genome-skims) could be transformative for genomic ecology, and results using k-mers have shown the advantage of this approach in identification and phylogenetic placement of eukaryotic species. Here, we revisit the basic question of estimating genomic parameters such as genome length, coverage, and repeat structure, focusing specifically on estimating the k-mer repeat spectrum. We show using a mix of theoretical and empirical analysis that there are fundamental limitations to estimating the k-mer spectra due to ill-conditioned systems, and that has implications for other genomic parameters. We get around this problem using a novel constrained optimization approach (Spline Linear Programming), where the constraints are learned empirically. On reads simulated at 1X coverage from 66 genomes, our method, REPeat SPECTra Estimation (RESPECT), had 2.2% error in length estimation compared to 27% error previously achieved. In shotgun sequenced read samples with contaminants, RESPECT length estimates had median error 4%, in contrast to other methods that had median error 80%. Together, the results suggest that low-pass genomic sequencing can yield reliable estimates of the length and repeat content of the genome. The RESPECT software will be publicly available at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_shahab-2Dsarmashghi_RESPECT.git&d=DwIGAw&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=ZozViWvD1E8PorCkfwYKYQMVKFoEcqLFm4Tg49XnPcA&m=f-xS8GMHKckknkc7Xpp8FJYw_ltUwz5frOw1a5pJ81EpdTOK8xhbYmrN4ZxniM96&s=717o8hLR1JmHFpRPSWG6xdUQTikyUjicjkipjFsKG4w&e=. Shahab Sarmashghi, Metin Balaban, Eleonora Rachtman, Behrouz Touri, Siavash Mirarab, Vineet Bafna |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2020 | Phylogenetic double placement of mixed samplesabstractMOTIVATION: Consider a simple computational problem. The inputs are (i) the set of mixed reads generated from a sample that combines two organisms and (ii) separate sets of reads for several reference genomes of known origins. The goal is to find the two organisms that constitute the mixed sample. When constituents are absent from the reference set, we seek to phylogenetically position them with respect to the underlying tree of the reference species. This simple yet fundamental problem (which we call phylogenetic double-placement) has enjoyed surprisingly little attention in the literature. As genome skimming (low-pass sequencing of genomes at low coverage, precluding assembly) becomes more prevalent, this problem finds wide-ranging applications in areas as varied as biodiversity research, food production and provenance, and evolutionary reconstruction. RESULTS: We introduce a model that relates distances between a mixed sample and reference species to the distances between constituents and reference species. Our model is based on Jaccard indices computed between each sample represented as k-mer sets. The model, built on several assumptions and approximations, allows us to formalize the phylogenetic double-placement problem as a non-convex optimization problem that decomposes mixture distances and performs phylogenetic placement simultaneously. Using a variety of techniques, we are able to solve this optimization problem numerically. We test the resulting method, called MIxed Sample Analysis tool (MISA), on a varied set of simulated and biological datasets. Despite all the assumptions used, the method performs remarkably well in practice. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software and data are available at https://github.com/balabanmetin/misa and https://github.com/balabanmetin/misa-data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Metin Balaban, Siavash Mirarab |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2019 | APPLES: Fast Distance-Based Phylogenetic Placement
Metin Balaban, Shahab Sarmashghi, Siavash Mirarab |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2016 | The Gene Family-Free Median of ThreeabstractThe gene family-free framework for comparative genomics aims at providing methods for gene order analysis that do not require prior gene family assignment, but work directly on a sequence similarity graph. We study two problems related to the breakpoint median of three genomes, which asks for the construction of a fourth genome that minimizes the sum of breakpoint distances to the input genomes. We present a model for constructing a median of three genomes in this family-free setting, based on maximizing an objective function that generalizes the classical breakpoint distance by integrating sequence similarity in the score of a gene adjacency. We study its computational complexity and we describe an integer linear program (ILP) for its exact solution. We further discuss a related problem called family-free adjacencies for k genomes for the special case of $$k \le 3$$ and present an ILP for its solution. However, for this problem, the computation of exact solutions remains intractable for sufficiently large instances. We then proceed to describe a heuristic method, FFAdj-AM, which performs well in practice. The developed methods compute accurate positional orthologs for genomes comparable in size of bacterial genomes on simulated data and genomic data acquired from the OMA orthology database. In particular, FFAdj-AM performs equally or better when compared to the well-established gene family prediction tool MultiMSOAR. We study the computational complexity of a new family-free model and present algorithms for its solution. With FFAdj-AM, we propose an appealing alternative to established tools for identifying higher confidence positional orthologs. Daniel Doerr, Pedro Feijão, Metin Balaban, Cédric Chauve |
WABI | 3 |