Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yasumasa Onoe

dblp:182/2268 · also Yasumasa Miyamoto · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Language models and text generation · 32% Vision and language · 26% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visual content generation and editing · 70% Image and video processing · 30%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
1.522024
ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions · EMNLP 2024
DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Images · ECCV (60) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing
1.322023
Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillation · NeurIPS 2023
Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge · ACL (1) 2023
Visual content generation and editing › image generation
text-to-image generation
0.912025
Revisiting text-to-image evaluation with Gecko: on metrics, prompts, and human rating · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning › description generation
detailed image description
0.812024
ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › hierarchical diffusion model
cascaded diffusion model
0.712023
Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.712023
Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillation · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge injection
0.712023
Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge learning
knowledge propagation
0.712023
Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge · ACL (1) 2023
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing
0.712023
Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting · CVPR 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration › image inpainting
text-guided image inpainting
0.712023
Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
box embedding
0.512021
Modeling Fine-Grained Entity Types with Box Embeddings · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity typing
0.512021
Modeling Fine-Grained Entity Types with Box Embeddings · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity linking
0.412020
Fine-Grained Entity Typing for Domain Independent Entity Linking · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity typing
fine-grained entity typing
0.412020
Fine-Grained Entity Typing for Domain Independent Entity Linking · AAAI 2020
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › image-text alignment
text-to-image alignment
0.312025
Revisiting text-to-image evaluation with Gecko: on metrics, prompts, and human rating · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
character-level language modeling
0.212016
Gated Word-Character Recurrent Language Model · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model
0.212016
Gated Word-Character Recurrent Language Model · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
recurrent neural network language model
0.212016
Gated Word-Character Recurrent Language Model · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212023
Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillation · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human annotation · 1.7correlation analysis · 1.7object detection · 1.3fine-tuning · 1.3multimodal language model · 0.8transfer set generation · 0.7in-context learning · 0.7gradient-based fine-tuning · 0.7context distillation · 0.7box embedding · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Revisiting text-to-image evaluation with Gecko: on metrics, prompts, and human rating
abstract
While text-to-image (T2I) generative models have become ubiquitous, they do not necessarily generate images that align with a given prompt. While many metrics and benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate T2I models and alignment metrics, the impact of the evaluation components (prompt sets, human annotations, evaluation task) has not been systematically measured. We find that looking at only *one slice of data*, i.e. one set of capabilities or human annotations, is not enough to obtain stable conclusions that generalise to new conditions or slices when evaluating T2I models or alignment metrics. We address this by introducing an evaluation suite of $>$100K annotations across four human annotation templates that comprehensively evaluates models' capabilities across a range of methods for gathering human annotations and comparing models. In particular, we propose (1) a carefully curated set of prompts -- *Gecko2K*; (2) a statistically grounded method of comparing T2I models; and (3) how to systematically evaluate metrics under three *evaluation tasks* -- *model ordering, pair-wise instance scoring, point-wise instance scoring*. Using this evaluation suite, we evaluate a wide range of metrics and find that a metric may do better in one setting but worse in another. As a result, we introduce a new, interpretable auto-eval metric that is consistently better correlated with human ratings than such existing metrics on our evaluation suite--across different human templates and evaluation settings--and on TIFA160.
Olivia Wiles, Isabela Albuquerque, Ivana Kajic, Su Wang 0001, Emanuele Bugliarello, Yasumasa Onoe, Pinelopi Papalampidi, Ira Ktena, Christopher Knutsen, Cyrus Rashtchian, Anant Nawalgaria, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Aida Nematzadeh
ICLR7
2024 DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Images
Yasumasa Onoe, Sunayana Rane, Zachary Berger, Yonatan Bitton, Jaemin Cho 0001, Roopal Garg, Alexander Ku, Zarana Parekh, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Garrett Tanzer, Su Wang 0001, Jason Baldridge
ECCV (60)1
2024 ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions
abstract
Roopal Garg, Andrea Burns, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Yonatan Bitton, Ceslee Montgomery, Yasumasa Onoe, Andrew Bunner, Ranjay Krishna, Jason Michael Baldridge, Radu Soricut. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Roopal Garg, Andrea Burns, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Yonatan Bitton, Ceslee Montgomery, Yasumasa Onoe, Andrew Bunner, Ranjay Krishna, Jason Baldridge, Radu Soricut
EMNLP6
2023 Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge
abstract
Pre-trained language models (LMs) are used for knowledge intensive tasks like question answering, but their knowledge gets continuously outdated as the world changes.Prior work has studied targeted updates to LMs, injecting individual facts and evaluating whether the model learns these facts while not changing predictions on other contexts.We take a step forward and study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts): for example, after learning that something is a TV show, does an LM predict that you can watch it?We study this with two clozestyle tasks: an existing dataset of real-world sentences about novel entities (ECBD) as well as a new controlled benchmark with manually designed templates requiring varying levels of inference about injected knowledge.Surprisingly, we find that existing methods for updating knowledge (gradient-based fine-tuning and modifications of this approach) show little propagation of injected knowledge.These methods improve performance on cloze instances only when there is lexical overlap between injected facts and target inferences.Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings, suggesting that there is substantial headroom for parameterupdating approaches for knowledge injection.
Yasumasa Onoe, Michael J. Q. Zhang, Shankar Padmanabhan, Greg Durrett, Eunsol Choi
ACL (1)1
2023 Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting
abstract
Text-guided image editing can have a transformative impact in supporting creative applications. A key challenge is to generate edits that are faithful to input text prompts, while consistent with input images. We present Imagen Editor, a cascaded diffusion model built, by fine-tuning Imagen [36] on text-guided image inpainting. Imagen Editor's edits are faithful to the text prompts, which is accomplished by using object detectors to propose inpainting masks during training. In addition, Imagen Editor captures fine details in the input image by conditioning the cascaded pipeline on the original high resolution image. To improve qualitative and quantitative evaluation, we introduce EditBench, a systematic benchmark for text-guided image inpainting. EditBench evaluates inpainting edits on natural and generated images exploring objects, attributes, and scenes. Through extensive human evaluation on EditBench, we find that object-masking during training leads to across-the-board improvements in text-image alignment – such that Imagen Editor is preferred over DALL-E 2 [31] and Stable Diffusion [33] – and, as a cohort, these models are better at object-rendering than text-rendering, and handle material/color/size attributes better than count/shape attributes.
Su Wang 0001, Chitwan Saharia, Ceslee Montgomery, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Shai Noy, Stefano Pellegrini, Yasumasa Onoe, Sarah Laszlo, David J. Fleet, Radu Soricut, Jason Baldridge, Mohammad Norouzi 0002
CVPR7
2023 Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillation
abstract
Modern language models have the capacity to store and use immense amounts of knowledge about real-world entities, but it remains unclear how to update such knowledge stored in model parameters. While prior methods for updating knowledge in LMs successfully inject atomic facts, updated LMs fail to make inferences based on injected facts. In this work, we demonstrate that a context distillation-based approach can both impart knowledge about entities \emph{and} propagate that knowledge to enable broader inferences. Our approach consists of two stages: transfer set generation and distillation on the transfer set. We first generate a transfer set by prompting a language model to generate continuations from the entity definition. Then, we update the model parameters so that the distribution of the LM (the 'student') matches the distribution of the LM conditioned on the definition (the 'teacher') on the transfer set. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach is more effective at propagating knowledge updates than fine-tuning and other gradient-based knowledge-editing methods. Moreover, it does not compromise performance in other contexts, even when injecting the definitions of up to 150 entities at once.
Shankar Padmanabhan, Yasumasa Onoe, Michael J. Q. Zhang, Greg Durrett, Eunsol Choi
NeurIPS2
2021 Modeling Fine-Grained Entity Types with Box Embeddings
abstract
Yasumasa Onoe, Michael Boratko, Andrew McCallum, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Yasumasa Onoe, Michael Boratko, Andrew McCallum, Greg Durrett
ACL/IJCNLP (1)1
2020 Fine-Grained Entity Typing for Domain Independent Entity Linking
abstract
Neural entity linking models are very powerful, but run the risk of overfitting to the domain they are trained in. For this problem, a “domain” is characterized not just by genre of text but even by factors as specific as the particular distribution of entities, as neural models tend to overfit by memorizing properties of frequent entities in a dataset. We tackle the problem of building robust entity linking models that generalize effectively and do not rely on labeled entity linking data with a specific entity distribution. Rather than predicting entities directly, our approach models fine-grained entity properties, which can help disambiguate between even closely related entities. We derive a large inventory of types (tens of thousands) from Wikipedia categories, and use hyperlinked mentions in Wikipedia to distantly label data and train an entity typing model. At test time, we classify a mention with this typing model and use soft type predictions to link the mention to the most similar candidate entity. We evaluate our entity linking system on the CoNLL-YAGO dataset (Hoffart et al. 2011) and show that our approach outperforms prior domain-independent entity linking systems. We also test our approach in a harder setting derived from the WikilinksNED dataset (Eshel et al. 2017) where all the mention-entity pairs are unseen during test time. Results indicate that our approach generalizes better than a state-of-the-art neural model on the dataset.
Yasumasa Onoe, Greg Durrett
AAAI1
2016 Gated Word-Character Recurrent Language Model
abstract
We introduce a recurrent neural network language model (RNN-LM) with long shortterm memory (LSTM) units that utilizes both character-level and word-level inputs.Our model has a gate that adaptively finds the optimal mixture of the character-level and wordlevel inputs.The gate creates the final vector representation of a word by combining two distinct representations of the word.The character-level inputs are converted into vector representations of words using a bidirectional LSTM.The word-level inputs are projected into another high-dimensional space by a word lookup table.The final vector representations of words are used in the LSTM language model which predicts the next word given all the preceding words.Our model with the gating mechanism effectively utilizes the character-level inputs for rare and out-ofvocabulary words and outperforms word-level language models on several English corpora.
Yasumasa Onoe, Kyunghyun Cho
EMNLP1