Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonard Kleinhans
dblp:182/2560
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Lifted Inference for Convex Quadratic Programs · AAAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization › quadratic programming
convex quadratic programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Lifted Inference for Convex Quadratic Programs · AAAI 2017 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
symmetry exploitation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Lifted Inference for Convex Quadratic Programs · AAAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient · 0.6convex quadratic programming · 0.6cutting-plane algorithm · 0.3cutting plane algorithm · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Lifted Inference for Convex Quadratic ProgramsabstractSymmetry is the essential element of lifted inferencethat has recently demonstrated the possibility to perform very efficient inference in highly-connected, but symmetric probabilistic models. This raises the question, whether this holds for optimization problems in general.Here we show that for a large classof optimization methods this is actually the case.Specifically, we introduce the concept of fractionalsymmetries of convex quadratic programs (QPs),which lie at the heart of many AI and machine learning approaches,and exploit it to lift, i.e., to compress QPs.These lifted QPs can then be tackled with the usual optimization toolbox (off-the-shelf solvers, cutting plane algorithms,stochastic gradients etc.). If the original QP exhibitssymmetry, then the lifted one will generallybe more compact, and hence more efficient to solve. Martin Mladenov, Leonard Kleinhans, Kristian Kersting |
AAAI | 2 |