Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clemens Rosenbaum
dblp:182/2594
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 38% Language models and text generation · 38% Learning paradigms · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Machine learning and data management · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option discovery |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | On the Role of Weight Sharing During Deep Option Learning · AAAI 2020 Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Information retrieval
case-based retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning and data management › data selection
in-context example selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Role of Weight Sharing During Deep Option Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
dynamic routing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Routing Networks: Adaptive Selection of Non-Linear Functions for Multi-Task Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Routing Networks: Adaptive Selection of Non-Linear Functions for Multi-Task Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
successor representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.5attention bottleneck · 1.5weight sharing · 0.4policy gradient · 0.4deep successor representation · 0.3reasoning · 0.3query learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist BottlenecksabstractIn-Context Learning (ICL) is the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform new tasks when conditioned on prompts comprising a few task examples. However, ICL performance can be critically sensitive to the choice of examples. To dynamically select the best examples for every test input, we propose Example Gisting, a novel approach for training example encoders through supervised finetuning with an attention bottleneck between the inputs and outputs. These gist models form the basis for GistScore, a novel metric for scoring and selecting informative examples. Further, we experiment with two variations: (1) finetuning gist models for each dataset and (2) multi-task training a single model on a large collection of datasets. The latter can be used for new tasks out-of-the-box, enabling a training-free ICL pipeline. Evaluations with 21 datasets spanning 9 tasks and 8 diverse LLMs show that our fine-tuned models get state-of-the-art ICL performance with over 20% absolute gain over off-the-shelf retrievers and 5% over the best prior methods. Further, our multi-task model generalizes well to new tasks, datasets, and prompt templates. Selection using this model matches or outperforms prior methods while being three orders of magnitude faster than the strongest training-free baseline. Shivanshu Gupta, Clemens Rosenbaum, Ethan R. Elenberg |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | On the Role of Weight Sharing During Deep Option LearningabstractThe options framework is a popular approach for building temporally extended actions in reinforcement learning. In particular, the option-critic architecture provides general purpose policy gradient theorems for learning actions from scratch that are extended in time. However, past work makes the key assumption that each of the components of option-critic has independent parameters. In this work we note that while this key assumption of the policy gradient theorems of option-critic holds in the tabular case, it is always violated in practice for the deep function approximation setting. We thus reconsider this assumption and consider more general extensions of option-critic and hierarchical option-critic training that optimize for the full architecture with each update. It turns out that not assuming parameter independence challenges a belief in prior work that training the policy over options can be disentangled from the dynamics of the underlying options. In fact, learning can be sped up by focusing the policy over options on states where options are actually likely to terminate. We put our new algorithms to the test in application to sample efficient learning of Atari games, and demonstrate significantly improved stability and faster convergence when learning long options. 1 Matthew Riemer, Ignacio Cases, Clemens Rosenbaum, Miao Liu 0001, Gerald Tesauro |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representation
Marlos C. Machado, Clemens Rosenbaum, Miao Liu 0001, Gerald Tesauro, Murray Campbell |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Routing Networks: Adaptive Selection of Non-Linear Functions for Multi-Task Learning
Clemens Rosenbaum, Tim Klinger, Matthew Riemer |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2017 | Learning to Query, Reason, and Answer Questions On Ambiguous Texts
Tim Klinger, Clemens Rosenbaum, Joseph P. Bigus, Murray Campbell, Ban Kawas, Kartik Talamadupula, Gerald Tesauro, Satinder Singh 0001 |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |