Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marianne Procopio
dblp:182/4458
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9518-1259ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › interactive visualization
progressive visualization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Impact of Cognitive Biases on Progressive Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty visualization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Impact of Cognitive Biases on Progressive Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.6cognitive bias analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Impact of Cognitive Biases on Progressive VisualizationabstractProgressive visualization is fast becoming a technique in the visualization community to help users interact with large amounts of data. With progressive visualization, users can examine intermediate results of complex or long running computations, without waiting for the computation to complete. While this has shown to be beneficial to users, recent research has identified potential risks. For example, users may misjudge the uncertainty in the intermediate results and draw incorrect conclusions or see patterns that are not present in the final results. In this article, we conduct a comprehensive set of studies to quantify the advantages and limitations of progressive visualization. Based on a recent report by Micallef et al., we examine four types of cognitive biases that can occur with progressive visualization: uncertainty bias, illusion bias, control bias, and anchoring bias. The results of the studies suggest a cautious but promising use of progressive visualization - while there can be significant savings in task completion time, accuracy can be negatively affected in certain conditions. These findings confirm earlier reports of the benefits and drawbacks of progressive visualization and that continued research into mitigating the effects of cognitive biases is necessary. Marianne Procopio, Ab Mosca, Carlos Scheidegger, Eugene Wu 0002, Remco Chang |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |