Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Grosen

dblp:182/4713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
binary analysis
0.522017
Ramblr: Making Reassembly Great Again · NDSS 2017
SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.522016
SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016
Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution · NDSS 2016
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.212016
SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
0.212016
Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution · NDSS 2016
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
symbolic execution
0.212016
Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution · NDSS 2016
Program analysis › binary analysis
disassembly
0.112017
Ramblr: Making Reassembly Great Again · NDSS 2017
Program analysis
static analysis
0.112017
Ramblr: Making Reassembly Great Again · NDSS 2017
Program analysis › binary analysis
static binary analysis
0.112016
SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzing · 0.8symbolic execution · 0.5dynamic analysis · 0.5selective symbolic execution · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Ramblr: Making Reassembly Great Again
Ruoyu Wang 0001, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Antonio Bianchi, Aravind Machiry, John Grosen, Paul Grosen, Christopher Krügel, Giovanni Vigna
NDSS5
2016 Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution
Nick Stephens, John Grosen, Christopher Salls, Andrew Dutcher, Ruoyu Wang 0001, Jacopo Corbetta, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Christopher Krügel, Giovanni Vigna
NDSS2
2016 SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis
abstract
Finding and exploiting vulnerabilities in binary code is a challenging task. The lack of high-level, semantically rich information about data structures and control constructs makes the analysis of program properties harder to scale. However, the importance of binary analysis is on the rise. In many situations binary analysis is the only possible way to prove (or disprove) properties about the code that is actually executed. In this paper, we present a binary analysis framework that implements a number of analysis techniques that have been proposed in the past. We present a systematized implementation of these techniques, which allows other researchers to compose them and develop new approaches. In addition, the implementation of these techniques in a unifying framework allows for the direct comparison of these apporaches and the identification of their advantages and disadvantages. The evaluation included in this paper is performed using a recent dataset created by DARPA for evaluating the effectiveness of binary vulnerability analysis techniques. Our framework has been open-sourced and is available to the security community.
Yan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang 0001, Christopher Salls, Nick Stephens, Mario Polino, Andrew Dutcher, John Grosen, Siji Feng, Christophe Hauser, Christopher Krügel, Giovanni Vigna
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy7