Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Henner Schmidt
dblp:182/8928
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 54% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process dynamical model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
learning control |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › stability analysis
stability guarantees |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability analysis · 0.2markovian control policy · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward ModelsabstractLearning control has become an appealing alternative to the derivation of control laws based on classic control theory. However, a major shortcoming of learning control is the lack of performance guarantees which prevents its application in many real-world scenarios. As a step in this direction, we provide a stability analysis tool for controllers acting on dynamics represented by Gaussian processes (GPs). We consider arbitrary Markovian control policies and system dynamics given as (i) the mean of a GP, and (ii) the full GP distribution. For the first case, our tool finds a state space region, where the closed-loop system is provably stable. In the second case, it is well known that infinite horizon stability guarantees cannot exist. Instead, our tool analyzes finite time stability. Empirical evaluations on simulated benchmark problems support our theoretical results. Julia Vinogradska, Bastian Bischoff, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Anne Koch 0001, Henner Schmidt, Jan Peters 0001 |
ICML | 5 |