Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henner Schmidt

dblp:182/8928 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 54% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.212016
Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process dynamical model
0.212016
Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
learning control
0.212016
Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212016
Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › stability analysis
stability guarantees
0.112016
Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models · ICML 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stability analysis · 0.2markovian control policy · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models
abstract
Learning control has become an appealing alternative to the derivation of control laws based on classic control theory. However, a major shortcoming of learning control is the lack of performance guarantees which prevents its application in many real-world scenarios. As a step in this direction, we provide a stability analysis tool for controllers acting on dynamics represented by Gaussian processes (GPs). We consider arbitrary Markovian control policies and system dynamics given as (i) the mean of a GP, and (ii) the full GP distribution. For the first case, our tool finds a state space region, where the closed-loop system is provably stable. In the second case, it is well known that infinite horizon stability guarantees cannot exist. Instead, our tool analyzes finite time stability. Empirical evaluations on simulated benchmark problems support our theoretical results.
Julia Vinogradska, Bastian Bischoff, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Anne Koch 0001, Henner Schmidt, Jan Peters 0001
ICML5