Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kurt Cutajar
dblp:182/8946
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7393-2285ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 39% Optimization for machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
multiple instance learning explanation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › hierarchical gaussian process
deep gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian Processes · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian Processes · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian Processes · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian Processes · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple instance learning · 0.8deep learning · 0.8stochastic variational inference · 0.3random feature expansions · 0.3preconditioning · 0.2conjugate gradient · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Object SegmentationabstractSegment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in image/video object segmentation across many domains, but its large encoder makes it challenging for resource-constrained devices or real-time applications. One solution to this problem is to carry out knowledge distillation from the bulky encoder to a lightweight encoder, but this can result in degraded performance. In this work, we investigate multi-teacher distillation to mitigate performance degradation for distilled segmentation models. Using several foundation teacher models, our multi-teacher distilled models achieve 3.2 times speedup during end-to-end inference compared to SAM2 while achieving the best results of 74.4 and 71.1 (72.1 and 69.6 for single-teacher distillation) mIoU on the COCO and LVIS image segmentation datasets, as well as showing competitive results on video segmentation. Our results show that multi-teacher distillation offers a powerful solution for efficient image/video segmentation, while also maintaining compelling performance. Simon Zeng, Kurt Cutajar, Hanting Xie, Massimo Camplani, Richard Tomsett, Niall Twomey, Jas Kandola, Gavin K. C. Cheung |
ICIP | 2 |
| 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance LearningabstractConventional Time Series Classification (TSC) methods are often black boxes that obscure inherent interpretation of their decision-making processes. In this work, we leverage Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) to overcome this issue, and propose a new framework called MILLET: Multiple Instance Learning for Locally Explainable Time series classification. We apply MILLET to existing deep learning TSC models and show how they become inherently interpretable without compromising (and in some cases, even improving) predictive performance. We evaluate MILLET on 85 UCR TSC datasets and also present a novel synthetic dataset that is specially designed to facilitate interpretability evaluation. On these datasets, we show MILLET produces sparse explanations quickly that are of higher quality than other well-known interpretability methods. To the best of our knowledge, our work with MILLET is the first to develop general MIL methods for TSC and apply them to an extensive variety of domains. Joseph Early, Gavin K. C. Cheung, Kurt Cutajar, Hanting Xie, Jas Kandola, Niall Twomey |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2017 | Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian ProcessesabstractThe composition of multiple Gaussian Processes as a Deep Gaussian Process DGP enables a deep probabilistic nonparametric approach to flexibly tackle complex machine learning problems with sound quantification of uncertainty. Existing inference approaches for DGP models have limited scalability and are notoriously cumbersome to construct. In this work we introduce a novel formulation of DGPs based on random feature expansions that we train using stochastic variational inference. This yields a practical learning framework which significantly advances the state-of-the-art in inference for DGPs, and enables accurate quantification of uncertainty. We extensively showcase the scalability and performance of our proposal on several datasets with up to 8 million observations, and various DGP architectures with up to 30 hidden layers. Kurt Cutajar, Edwin V. Bonilla, Pietro Michiardi, Maurizio Filippone |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Entropic Trace Estimates for Log Determinants
Jack K. Fitzsimons, Diego Granziol, Kurt Cutajar, Michael A. Osborne, Maurizio Filippone, Stephen J. Roberts |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 3 |
| 2017 | Bayesian Inference of Log Determinants
Jack K. Fitzsimons, Kurt Cutajar, Maurizio Filippone, Michael A. Osborne, Stephen J. Roberts |
UAI | 2 |
| 2017 | AutoGP: Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Gaussian Process Models
Karl Krauth, Edwin V. Bonilla, Kurt Cutajar, Maurizio Filippone |
UAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Preconditioning Kernel MatricesabstractThe computational and storage complexity of kernel machines presents the primary barrier to their scaling to large, modern, datasets. A common way to tackle the scalability issue is to use the conjugate gradient algorithm, which relieves the constraints on both storage (the kernel matrix need not be stored) and computation (both stochastic gradients and parallelization can be used). Even so, conjugate gradient is not without its own issues: the conditioning of kernel matrices is often such that conjugate gradients will have poor convergence in practice. Preconditioning is a common approach to alleviating this issue. Here we propose preconditioned conjugate gradients for kernel machines, and develop a broad range of preconditioners particularly useful for kernel matrices. We describe a scalable approach to both solving kernel machines and learning their hyperparameters. We show this approach is exact in the limit of iterations and outperforms state-of-the-art approximations for a given computational budget. Kurt Cutajar, Michael A. Osborne, John P. Cunningham, Maurizio Filippone |
ICML | 1 |