Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hung-En Wang
dblp:182/9081
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 66% Automata and formal languages · 34% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
finite state machine testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
QBF encoding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › quantified boolean formula
quantified boolean formula solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › constraint solving
string constraint solving |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraints · ASE 2018 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraints · ASE 2018 |
Program analysis › data flow analysis › value analysis
string analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation · CAV (1) 2016 |
Automata and formal languages
finite automata |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation · CAV (1) 2016 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantified boolean satisfiability · 1.1circuit representation of NFSMs · 1.1logic circuit representation · 0.8automata manipulation · 0.5symbolic model checking · 0.3dependency graph · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean SatisfiabilityabstractHoming sequence derivation for nondeterministic finite state machines (NFSMs) has important applications in software/hardware system testing and verification. Unlike prior methods based on explicit tree-based search, in this article we formulate the derivation of a preset/adaptive homing sequence in terms of quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solving. This formulation exploits compact circuit representation of NFSMs and QBF encoding of the existence condition of homing sequence for effective computation. The implicit circuit representation effectively avoids explicit state enumeration, and can be more scalable. Different encoding schemes and QBF solvers are evaluated for their suitability for the homing sequence derivation. Experiments on various computation methods and benchmarks show the generality and feasibility of a proposed approach. Kuan-Hua Tu, Hung-En Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Natalia Kushik, Nina Yevtushenko 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 2018 | A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraintsabstractStrings with length constraints are prominent in software security analysis. Recent endeavors have made significant progress in developing constraint solvers for strings and integers. Most prior methods are based on deduction with inference rules or analysis using automata. The former may be inefficient when the constraints involve complex string manipulations such as language replacement; the latter may not be easily extended to handle length constraints and may be inadequate for counterexample generation due to approximation. Inspired by recent work on string analysis with logic circuit representation, we propose a new method for solving string with length constraints by an implicit representation of automata with length encoding. The length-encoded automata are of infinite states and can represent languages beyond regular expressions. By converting string and length constraints into a dependency graph of manipulations over length-encoded automata, a symbolic model checker for infinite state systems can be leveraged as an engine for the analysis of string and length constraints. Experiments show that our method has its unique capability of handling complex string and length constraints not solvable by existing methods. Hung-En Wang, Shih-Yu Chen, Fang Yu 0001, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang |
ASE | 1 |
| 2017 | Homing Sequence Derivation with Quantified Boolean Satisfiability
Hung-En Wang, Kuan-Hua Tu, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Natalia Kushik |
ICTSS | 1 |
| 2016 | String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation
Hung-En Wang, Tzung-Lin Tsai, Chun-Han Lin, Fang Yu 0001, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang |
CAV (1) | 1 |