Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hung-En Wang

dblp:182/9081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 66% Automata and formal languages · 34%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
finite state machine testing
0.612022
Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking
QBF encoding
0.612022
Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › quantified boolean formula
quantified boolean formula solving
0.612022
Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking › constraint solving
string constraint solving
0.312018
A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraints · ASE 2018
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking
0.312018
A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraints · ASE 2018
Program analysis › data flow analysis › value analysis
string analysis
0.212016
String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation · CAV (1) 2016
Automata and formal languages
finite automata
0.212016
String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation · CAV (1) 2016
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.212022
Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing
0.212022
Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantified boolean satisfiability · 1.1circuit representation of NFSMs · 1.1logic circuit representation · 0.8automata manipulation · 0.5symbolic model checking · 0.3dependency graph · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Homing Sequence Derivation With Quantified Boolean Satisfiability
abstract
Homing sequence derivation for nondeterministic finite state machines (NFSMs) has important applications in software/hardware system testing and verification. Unlike prior methods based on explicit tree-based search, in this article we formulate the derivation of a preset/adaptive homing sequence in terms of quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solving. This formulation exploits compact circuit representation of NFSMs and QBF encoding of the existence condition of homing sequence for effective computation. The implicit circuit representation effectively avoids explicit state enumeration, and can be more scalable. Different encoding schemes and QBF solvers are evaluated for their suitability for the homing sequence derivation. Experiments on various computation methods and benchmarks show the generality and feasibility of a proposed approach.
Kuan-Hua Tu, Hung-En Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Natalia Kushik, Nina Yevtushenko 0001
IEEE Trans. Computers2
2018 A symbolic model checking approach to the analysis of string and length constraints
abstract
Strings with length constraints are prominent in software security analysis. Recent endeavors have made significant progress in developing constraint solvers for strings and integers. Most prior methods are based on deduction with inference rules or analysis using automata. The former may be inefficient when the constraints involve complex string manipulations such as language replacement; the latter may not be easily extended to handle length constraints and may be inadequate for counterexample generation due to approximation. Inspired by recent work on string analysis with logic circuit representation, we propose a new method for solving string with length constraints by an implicit representation of automata with length encoding. The length-encoded automata are of infinite states and can represent languages beyond regular expressions. By converting string and length constraints into a dependency graph of manipulations over length-encoded automata, a symbolic model checker for infinite state systems can be leveraged as an engine for the analysis of string and length constraints. Experiments show that our method has its unique capability of handling complex string and length constraints not solvable by existing methods.
Hung-En Wang, Shih-Yu Chen, Fang Yu 0001, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
ASE1
2017 Homing Sequence Derivation with Quantified Boolean Satisfiability
Hung-En Wang, Kuan-Hua Tu, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Natalia Kushik
ICTSS1
2016 String Analysis via Automata Manipulation with Logic Circuit Representation
Hung-En Wang, Tzung-Lin Tsai, Chun-Han Lin, Fang Yu 0001, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
CAV (1)1