Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dimitris Papailliopoulos
dblp:182/9413
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 25% Approximation and online algorithms · 25% Computational complexity · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation
approximability |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On the Approximability of Sparse PCA · COLT 2016 |
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On the Approximability of Sparse PCA · COLT 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
semidefinite programming gaps |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On the Approximability of Sparse PCA · COLT 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse PCA |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On the Approximability of Sparse PCA · COLT 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semidefinite programming · 0.2SSE hardness · 0.2NP-hardness reduction · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | On the Approximability of Sparse PCAabstractIt is well known that Sparse PCA (Sparse Principal Component Analysis) is NP-hard to solve exactly on worst-case instances. What is the complexity of solving Sparse PCA approximately? Our contributions include: \beginenumerate \item a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves an n^-1/3-approximation; \item NP-hardness of approximation to within (1-\varepsilon), for some small constant \varepsilon > 0; \item SSE-hardness of approximation to within \em any constant factor; and \item an \exp\exp\left(Ω\left(\sqrt\log \log n\right)\right) (“quasi-quasi-polynomial”) gap for the standard semidefinite program. \endenumerate Siu On Chan, Dimitris Papailliopoulos, Aviad Rubinstein |
COLT | 2 |