Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Daly Jr.

dblp:183/0643 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 90% Query processing and optimization · 10%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.522016
Learning Query and Document Relevance from a Web-scale Click Graph · SIGIR 2016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.212016
Learning Query and Document Relevance from a Web-scale Click Graph · SIGIR 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › context-aware ranking
location-based ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › context-aware ranking
recency ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
relevance ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vector propagation · 0.2semantic matching · 0.2query rewriting · 0.2click-through data · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search
abstract
Search engines play a crucial role in our daily lives. Relevance is the core problem of a commercial search engine. It has attracted thousands of researchers from both academia and industry and has been studied for decades. Relevance in a modern search engine has gone far beyond text matching, and now involves tremendous challenges. The semantic gap between queries and URLs is the main barrier for improving base relevance. Clicks help provide hints to improve relevance, but unfortunately for most tail queries, the click information is too sparse, noisy, or missing entirely. For comprehensive relevance, the recency and location sensitivity of results is also critical. In this paper, we give an overview of the solutions for relevance in the Yahoo search engine. We introduce three key techniques for base relevance -- ranking functions, semantic matching features and query rewriting. We also describe solutions for recency sensitive relevance and location sensitive relevance. This work builds upon 20 years of existing efforts on Yahoo search, summarizes the most recent advances and provides a series of practical relevance solutions. The performance reported is based on Yahoo's commercial search engine, where tens of billions of urls are indexed and served by the ranking system.
Dawei Yin 0001, Yuening Hu, Jiliang Tang, Tim Daly Jr., Mianwei Zhou, Hua Ouyang, Changsung Kang, Hongbo Deng, Chikashi Nobata, Jean-Marc Langlois, Yi Chang 0001
KDD4
2016 Learning Query and Document Relevance from a Web-scale Click Graph
abstract
Click-through logs over query-document pairs provide rich and valuable information for multiple tasks in information retrieval. This paper proposes a vector propagation algorithm on the click graph to learn vector representations for both queries and documents in the same semantic space. The proposed approach incorporates both click and content information, and the produced vector representations can directly improve ranking performance for queries and documents that have been observed in the click log. For new queries and documents that are not in the click log, we propose a two-step framework to generate the vector representation, which significantly improves the coverage of our vectors while maintaining the high quality. Experiments on Web-scale search logs from a major commercial search engine demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed method. Evaluation results show that NDCG scores are significantly improved against multiple baselines by using the proposed method both as a ranking model and as a feature in a learning-to-rank framework.
Shan Jiang 0001, Yuening Hu, Changsung Kang, Tim Daly Jr., Dawei Yin 0001, Yi Chang 0001, ChengXiang Zhai
SIGIR4