Participatory design effectively engages stakeholders in technology development but is often constrained by small, resource-intensive activities. This study explores a scalable complementary method, enabling broad pattern identification in the design for interfaces in autonomous vehicles. We implemented a human-centered, iterative process that combined crowd creativity, structured participatory principles, and expert feedback. Across iterations, participant concepts evolved from simple cues to multimodal systems. Novel suggestions ranged from personalized features, like tracking lights, to inclusive elements like haptic feedback, progressively refining designs toward greater contextual awareness. To assess outcomes, we compared representative designs: a popular-design, reflecting the most frequently proposed ideas, and an innovative-design, merging participant innovations with expert input. Both were evaluated against a benchmark through video-based simulations. Results show that the popular-design outperformed the alternatives on both interpretability and user experience, with expert-validated innovations performing second best. These findings highlight the potential of scalable participatory methods for shaping emerging technologies.

Robot malfunctions are unavoidable in human–robot collaboration and oftentimes detrimental. Yet humans are rarely instructed on how to respond in such moments, leaving ample room for spontaneity and unpredictability. We studied 65 participants working alongside a collaborative robot under both normal operation and deliberate malfunction conditions. We analyzed unscripted vocal and action responses regarding situational awareness (SA)—whether malfunctions were noticed—and task-oriented response appropriateness—whether responses advanced or undermined the collaboration. During malfunctions, SA was universal, as was frustration and confusion, yet appropriateness diverged sharply: unscripted responses ranged from clarifying questions and corrective actions to sarcasm, comedic gestures, and intentional mismarkings. Efficiency malfunctions elicited far more productive responses than effectiveness malfunctions did, underscoring how actionability fundamentally shapes human intervention. Our findings reveal a fragile link between SA and task-aligned action, highlighting the need for robot transparency, explainability and adaptability, so collaborators are actively supported when things fail.

This study presents an innovative approach to optimal gait control for a soft quadruped robot enabled by four compressible tendon-driven soft actuators. Soft quadruped robots, compared to their rigid counterparts, are widely recognized for offering enhanced safety, lower weight, and simpler fabrication and control mechanisms. However, their highly deformable structure introduces nonlinear dynamics, making precise gait locomotion control complex. To solve this problem, we propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) method. The study employs a multi-stage approach, including state space restriction, data-driven surrogate model training, and MBRL development. Compared to benchmark methods, the proposed approach significantly improves the efficiency and performance of gait control policies. The developed policy is both robust and adaptable to the robot's deformable morphology. The study concludes by highlighting the practical applicability of these findings in real-world scenarios.

As autonomous vehicles become more integrated into shared human environments, effective communication with road users is essential for ensuring safety. While previous research has focused on developing external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs) to facilitate these interactions, we argue that involving users in the early creative stages can help address key challenges in the development of this technology. To explore this, our study adopts a participatory, crowd-sourced approach to gather user-generated ideas for eHMI designs. Participants were first introduced to fundamental eHMI concepts, equipping them to sketch their own design ideas in response to scenarios with varying levels of perceived risk. An initial pre-study with 29 participants showed that while they actively engaged in the process, there was a need to refine task objectives and encourage deeper reflection. To address these challenges, a follow-up study with 50 participants was conducted. The results revealed a strong preference for autonomous vehicles to communicate their awareness and intentions using lights (LEDs and projections), symbols, and text. Participants’ sketches prioritized multi-modal communication, directionality, and adaptability to enhance clarity, consistently integrating familiar vehicle elements to improve intuitiveness.