Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Zahra Shamsi

dblp:183/5715 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9834-2978ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 90% Computational science and engineering · 10%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics
0.812024
NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant analysis
0.812024
NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant genotyping
0.812024
NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multitask reasoning · 1.7large language model evaluation · 1.7pileup image simulation · 0.8image similarity · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CURIE: Evaluating LLMs on Multitask Scientific Long-Context Understanding and Reasoning
abstract
Scientific problem-solving involves synthesizing information while applying expert knowledge. We introduce CURIE, a scientific long-Context Understanding, Reasoning, and Information Extraction benchmark to measure the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in scientific problem-solving and assisting scientists in realistic workflows. This benchmark introduces ten challenging tasks with a total of 580 problems and solution pairs curated by experts in six disciplines - materials science, condensed matter physics, quantum computing, geo-spatial analysis, biodiversity, and proteins - covering both experimental and theoretical work-flows in science. We evaluate a range of closed and open LLMs on tasks in CURIE which requires domain expertise, comprehension of long in-context information,and multi-step reasoning. While Gemini Flash 2.0 and Claude-3 show consistent high comprehension across domains, the popular GPT-4o and command-R+ fail dramatically on protein sequencing tasks. With the best performance at 32% there is much room for improvement for all models. We hope that insights gained from CURIE can guide the future development of LLMs in sciences. Links to the data and evaluation code are in https://github.com/google/curie
Zahra Shamsi, Gowoon Cheon, Xuejian Ma, Shutong Li, Maria Tikhanovskaya, Peter C. Norgaard, Nayantara Mudur, Martyna Plomecka, Paul Raccuglia, Yasaman Bahri, Victor V. Albert, Pranesh Srinivasan, Haining Pan, Philippe Faist, Brian Rohr, Michael J. Statt, Dan Morris 0001, Drew Purves, Elise Kleeman
ICLR2
2024 NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Structural variants (SVs) play a causal role in numerous diseases but can be difficult to detect and accurately genotype (determine zygosity) with short-read genome sequencing data (SRS). Improving SV genotyping accuracy in SRS data, particularly for the many SVs first detected with long-read sequencing, will improve our understanding of genetic variation. RESULTS: NPSV-deep is a deep learning-based approach for genotyping previously reported insertion and deletion SVs that recasts this task as an image similarity problem. NPSV-deep predicts the SV genotype based on the similarity between pileup images generated from the actual SRS data and matching SRS simulations. We show that NPSV-deep consistently matches or improves upon the state-of-the-art for SV genotyping accuracy across different SV call sets, samples and variant types, including a 25% reduction in genotyping errors for the Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) high-confidence SVs. NPSV-deep is not limited to the SVs as described; it improves deletion genotyping concordance a further 1.5 percentage points for GIAB SVs (92%) by automatically correcting imprecise/incorrectly described SVs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Python/C++ source code and pre-trained models freely available at https://github.com/mlinderm/npsv2.
Michael D. Linderman, Jacob Wallace, Alderik van der Heyde, Eliza Wieman, Daniel Brey, Yiran Shi, Zahra Shamsi, Jeremiah Liu, Bruce D. Gelb, Ali Bashir
Bioinform.8