Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Weisgerber

dblp:183/6484 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security › mobile security
android security
0.212016
On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
access control
0.212016
On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

permission specification analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 ARTist: The Android Runtime Instrumentation and Security Toolkit
abstract
With the introduction of Android 5 Lollipop, the Android Runtime (ART) superseded the Dalvik Virtual Machine (DVM) by introducing ahead-of-time compilation and native execution of applications, effectively deprecating seminal works such as TaintDroid that hitherto depend on the DVM. In this paper, we discuss alternatives to overcome those restrictions and highlight advantages for the security community that can be derived from ART's novel on-device compiler dex2oat and its accompanying runtime components. To this end, we introduce ARTist, a compiler-based application instrumentation solution for Android that does not depend on operating system modifications and solely operates on the application layer. Since dex2oat is yet uncharted, our approach required first and foremost a thorough study of the compiler suite's internals and in particular of the new default compiler backend called Optimizing. We document the results of this study in this paper to facilitate independent research on this topic and exemplify the viability of ARTist by realizing two use cases. In particular, we conduct a case study on whether taint tracking can be re-instantiated using a compiler-based app instrumentation framework. Overall, our results provide compelling arguments for the community to choose compiler-based approaches over alternative bytecode or binary rewriting approaches for security solutions on Android.
Michael Backes 0001, Sven Bugiel, Oliver Schranz, Philipp von Styp-Rekowsky, Sebastian Weisgerber
EuroS&P5
2016 On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification Analysis
Michael Backes 0001, Sven Bugiel, Erik Derr, Patrick D. McDaniel, Damien Octeau, Sebastian Weisgerber
USENIX Security Symposium6