Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Evan Miller
dblp:183/6744
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
reasoning under partial observability |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Abduction Under Partial Observability · AAAI 2018 Learning Abduction Using Partial Observability · AAAI 2018 |
Logic in computer science › nonmonotonic reasoning
abduction |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Abduction Under Partial Observability · AAAI 2018 Learning Abduction Using Partial Observability · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
learning from examples · 0.7implicitly learned rules · 0.7declarative background knowledge · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Securing Deep Neural Networks on Edge from Membership Inference Attacks Using Trusted Execution EnvironmentsabstractPrivacy concerns arise from malicious attacks on Deep Neural Network (DNN) applications during sensitive data inference on edge devices. Membership Inference Attack (MIA) is developed by adversaries to determine whether sensitive data is used to train the DNN applications. Prior work uses Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to hide DNN model inference from adversaries on edge devices. Unfortunately, existing methods have two major problems. First, due to the restricted memory of TEEs, prior work cannot secure large-size DNNs from gradient-based MIAs. Second, prior work is ineffective on output-based MIAs. To mitigate the problems, we present a depth-wise layer partitioning method to run large sensitive layers inside TEEs. We further propose a model quantization strategy to improve the defense capability of DNNs against output-based MIAs and accelerate the computation. We also automate the process of securing PyTorch-based DNN models inside TEEs. Experiments on Raspberry Pi 3B+ show that our method can reduce the accuracy of gradient-based MIAs on AlexNet, VGG-16, and ResNet-20 evaluated on the CIFAR-100 dataset by 28.8%, 11%, and 35.3%. The accuracy of output-based MIAs on the three models is also reduced by 18.5%, 13.4%, and 29.6%, respectively. Cheng-Yun Yang, Gowri Ramshankar, Nicholas Eliopoulos, Purvish Jajal, Sudarshan Nambiar, Evan Miller, Jing (Dave) Tian, Shuo-Han Chen, Chiy-Ferng Perng, Yung-Hsiang Lu |
ISLPED | 6 |
| 2018 | Learning Abduction Using Partial Observability
Brendan Juba, Zongyi Li, Evan Miller |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Learning Abduction Under Partial ObservabilityabstractOur work extends Juba’s formulation of learning abductive reasoning from examples, in which both the relative plausibility of various explanations, as well as which explanations are valid, are learned directly from data. We extend the formulation to consider partially observed examples, along with declarative background knowledge about the missing data. We show that it is possible to use implicitly learned rules together with the explicitly given declarative knowledge to support hypotheses in the course of abduction. We observe that when a small explanation exists, it is possible to obtain a much-improved guarantee in the challenging exception-tolerant setting. Brendan Juba, Zongyi Li, Evan Miller |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2016 | A Flexible Real-Time Ridesharing System Considering Current Road ConditionsabstractRecently, ridesharing applications, such as Uber, have gained popularity by helping riders to save money. However, current real-time ridesharing systems with time-window constraints have not yet considered the impact of real-time road conditions. In this work, we propose transferring algorithms and incentive models to enhance the flexibility of an existing large scale real-time ridesharing system. Transferring algorithms aim to transfer those users who experienced delay to other vehicles by using a pair wise bounding-box pruning technique. The incentive models avoid the use of transferring but instead compensate affected passengers with credits to maintain their satisfaction level in a different way. Extensive experiments were conducted using a real road network. Results show that our proposed algorithms and models are able to boost users' satisfaction level up to 90% under the influence of real-time road conditions. San Yeung, Evan Miller, Sanjay Madria |
MDM | 2 |