EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Madhusudan Koppal
dblp:183/6778
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 76% Cellular and mobile networks · 18% Wireless networking · 6% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
constructive interference |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving the Performance of Constructive Interference Using Destructive Interference in WSNs · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019 Murphy loves CI: Unfolding and improving constructive interference in WSNs · INFOCOM 2016 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving the Performance of Constructive Interference Using Destructive Interference in WSNs · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019 Murphy loves CI: Unfolding and improving constructive interference in WSNs · INFOCOM 2016 |
Cellular and mobile networks › power control
power adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving the Performance of Constructive Interference Using Destructive Interference in WSNs · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › wireless sensor network routing
flooding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Murphy loves CI: Unfolding and improving constructive interference in WSNs · INFOCOM 2016 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
time synchronization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Murphy loves CI: Unfolding and improving constructive interference in WSNs · INFOCOM 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
testbed experimentation · 0.6distributed power control · 0.4transmission power adaptation · 0.2distributed algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Understanding and Improving the Performance of Constructive Interference Using Destructive Interference in WSNsabstractThe constructive interference (CI) phenomenon has been exploited by a number of protocols for providing energy-efficient, low-latency, and reliable data collection and dissemination services in wireless sensor networks. These protocols consider CI to provide highly reliable packet delivery. This has attracted attention to understand the working of CI; however, the existing works present inconsistent views. Furthermore, these works do not study in the real-world settings where the physical conditions of deployment and unreliable wireless channels also impact the performance of CI. Therefore, we study the phenomenon of CI, considering a receiver's viewpoint and analyze the parameters that affect CI. We validate our arguments with results from extensive and rigorous experimentation in real-world settings. This paper presents comprehensive insights into the CI phenomenon. With the understanding, we develop the destructive interference-based power adaptation (DIPA), an energy-efficient and distributed algorithm, that adapts transmission power to improve the performance of CI. Since CI-based protocols cannot have an explicit acknowledgment packet, we make use of destructive interference on a designated byte to provide a feedback. We leverage this feedback to adapt transmission powers. We compared CI with and without DIPA in two real-life testbeds. On one testbed, we achieve around 25% lower packet losses while using only half of its transmission power for 64-B packets. On the other testbed, we achieve 25% lower packet losses while consuming only 47% of its transmission power for 128-B packets. Existing CI-based protocols can easily incorporate DIPA into them to achieve lower packet losses and higher energy efficiencies. Vijay S. Rao, R. Venkatesha Prasad, Prabhakar Venkata Tamma, Chayan Sarkar, Madhusudan Koppal, Ignas G. Niemegeers |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 5 |
| 2016 | Murphy loves CI: Unfolding and improving constructive interference in WSNsabstractConstructive Interference (CI) phenomenon has been exploited by Glossy, a mechanism for low-latency and reliable network flooding and time synchronization for wireless sensor networks. Recently, CI has also been used for other applications such as data collection and multicasting in static and mobile WSNs. These applications base their working on the high reliability promised by Glossy regardless of the physical conditions of deployment, number of nodes in the network, and unreliable wireless channels that may be detrimental for CI. There are several works that study the working of CI, but they present inconsistent views. We study CI from a receiver's viewpoint, list factors that affect CI and also specify how and why they affect. We validate our arguments with results from extensive and rigorous experimentation in real-world settings. This paper presents comprehensive insights into CI phenomenon. With this understanding, we improve the performance of CI through an energy-efficient and distributed algorithm. We cause destructive interference on a designated byte to provide negative feedback. We leverage this to adapt transmission powers. Compared to Glossy, we achieve 25% lesser packet losses while using only half of its transmission power. Vijay S. Rao, Madhusudan Koppal, R. Venkatesha Prasad, Prabhakar Venkata Tamma, Chayan Sarkar, Ignas G. Niemegeers |
INFOCOM | 2 |