Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xingye Da
dblp:183/7773
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4439-4980ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 52% Motion planning and robot control · 31% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 18% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotion · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
quadruped locomotion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotion · ICRA 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotion · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 2 | 2021 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave field · ICRA 2017 Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotion · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bipedal robot
bipedal locomotion control |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave field · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave field · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
locomotion policy |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal Locomotion · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave field · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bipedal robot
underactuated biped |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave field · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sim-to-sim transfer · 0.5reinforcement learning · 0.5ablation study · 0.5virtual constraints · 0.3supervised learning · 0.3parameter optimization · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | GLiDE: Generalizable Quadrupedal Locomotion in Diverse Environments with a Centroidal Model
Zhaoming Xie, Xingye Da, Buck Babich, Animesh Garg, Michiel van de Panne |
WAFR | 2 |
| 2021 | Dynamics Randomization Revisited: A Case Study for Quadrupedal LocomotionabstractUnderstanding the gap between simulation and reality is critical for reinforcement learning with legged robots, which are largely trained in simulation. However, recent work has resulted in sometimes conflicting conclusions with regard to which factors are important for success, including the role of dynamics randomization. In this paper, we aim to provide clarity and understanding on the role of dynamics randomization in learning robust locomotion policies for the Laikago quadruped robot. Surprisingly, in contrast to prior work with the same robot model, we find that direct sim-to-real transfer is possible without dynamics randomization or on-robot adaptation schemes. We conduct extensive ablation studies in a sim-to-sim setting to understand the key issues underlying successful policy transfer, including other design decisions that can impact policy robustness. We further ground our conclusions via sim-to-real experiments with various gaits, speeds, and stepping frequencies. Additional Details: pair.toronto.edu/understanding-dr/ Zhaoming Xie, Xingye Da, Michiel van de Panne, Buck Babich, Animesh Garg |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2017 | Supervised learning for stabilizing underactuated bipedal robot locomotion, with outdoor experiments on the wave fieldabstractSupervised learning is used to build a control policy for robust, stable, dynamic walking of an underactuated bipedal robot. The training and testing sets consist of controllers based on a full dynamic model, virtual constraints, and parameter optimization to meet torque limits, friction cone, and environmental conditions. The controllers are designed to induce locally exponentially stable periodic walking gaits at various speeds, both forward and backward, and for various constant ground slopes. They are also designed to induce aperiodic gaits that transition among a subset of the periodic gaits in a fixed number of steps. In experiments, the learned policy allows a 3D bipedal robot to recover from a significant kick. It also enables the robot to walk down a 22 degree slope and walk on sinusoidally varying terrain, all without using a camera. During the development of these results, it is demonstrated that supervised learning of locally exponentially stable controllers can result in a loss of stability and a means to avoid this is suggested. Xingye Da, Ross Hartley, Jessy W. Grizzle |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2016 | Dynamic Walking on Stepping Stones with Gait Library and Control Barrier Functions
Quan Nguyen 0004, Xingye Da, Jessy W. Grizzle, Koushil Sreenath |
WAFR | 2 |