Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yeganeh Safaei
dblp:183/8531
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-2960-2828ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Web and mobile security · 35% Network security · 23% Authentication and access control · 21% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › web tracking
browser fingerprinting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Browser Polygraph: Efficient Deployment of Coarse-Grained Browser Fingerprints for Web-Scale Detection of Fraud Browsers · IMC 2024 |
Authentication and access control › authentication
risk-based authentication |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Browser Polygraph: Efficient Deployment of Coarse-Grained Browser Fingerprints for Web-Scale Detection of Fraud Browsers · IMC 2024 |
Web and mobile security
phishing |
0.5 | 2 | 2020 | PhishFarm: A Scalable Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Evasion Techniques against Browser Phishing Blacklists · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019 PhishTime: Continuous Longitudinal Measurement of the Effectiveness of Anti-phishing Blacklists · USENIX Security Symposium 2020 |
Network security › email security
phishing defense |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PhishTime: Continuous Longitudinal Measurement of the Effectiveness of Anti-phishing Blacklists · USENIX Security Symposium 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.8coarse-grained fingerprinting · 0.8longitudinal measurement · 0.4measurement study · 0.4dynamic analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Browser Polygraph: Efficient Deployment of Coarse-Grained Browser Fingerprints for Web-Scale Detection of Fraud BrowsersabstractIn this paper, we address the prevalent issue of account takeover (ATO) fraud, which significantly impacts businesses through stolen user information. Websites have adopted risk-based authentication, incorporating browser fingerprinting techniques to counteract this threat. However, attackers have adapted by using anti-detect browsers, referred to as fraud browsers, to spoof user information effectively. While traditional fingerprinting methods are capable of identifying fraud browsers, they encounter scalability and performance challenges in risk-based systems. To address these issues, we developed Browser Polygraph, an ML-based tool that applies coarse-grained privacy-preserving fingerprints to assess browser authenticity and assigns risk factors to suspicious sessions. Coarse-grained fingerprints, by design, cannot be used for user tracking but only for fraud detection purposes. Deployed at a major financial company, Browser Polygraph has flagged suspicious sessions, enabling more targeted identification of potential fraud, thus enhancing the company's ability to tackle ATO attempts. Faezeh Kalantari, Mehrnoosh Zaeifi, Yeganeh Safaei, Marzieh Bitaab, Adam Oest, Gianluca Stringhini, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Adam Doupé |
IMC | 3 |
| 2020 | PhishTime: Continuous Longitudinal Measurement of the Effectiveness of Anti-phishing Blacklists
Adam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Brad Wardman, Kevin Tyers, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Adam Doupé |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2019 | PhishFarm: A Scalable Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Evasion Techniques against Browser Phishing BlacklistsabstractPhishing attacks have reached record volumes in recent years. Simultaneously, modern phishing websites are growing in sophistication by employing diverse cloaking techniques to avoid detection by security infrastructure. In this paper, we present PhishFarm: a scalable framework for methodically testing the resilience of anti-phishing entities and browser blacklists to attackers' evasion efforts. We use PhishFarm to deploy 2,380 live phishing sites (on new, unique, and previously-unseen .com domains) each using one of six different HTTP request filters based on real phishing kits. We reported subsets of these sites to 10 distinct anti-phishing entities and measured both the occurrence and timeliness of native blacklisting in major web browsers to gauge the effectiveness of protection ultimately extended to victim users and organizations. Our experiments revealed shortcomings in current infrastructure, which allows some phishing sites to go unnoticed by the security community while remaining accessible to victims. We found that simple cloaking techniques representative of real-world attacks- including those based on geolocation, device type, or JavaScript- were effective in reducing the likelihood of blacklisting by over 55% on average. We also discovered that blacklisting did not function as intended in popular mobile browsers (Chrome, Safari, and Firefox), which left users of these browsers particularly vulnerable to phishing attacks. Following disclosure of our findings, anti-phishing entities are now better able to detect and mitigate several cloaking techniques (including those that target mobile users), and blacklisting has also become more consistent between desktop and mobile platforms- but work remains to be done by anti-phishing entities to ensure users are adequately protected. Our PhishFarm framework is designed for continuous monitoring of the ecosystem and can be extended to test future state-of-the-art evasion techniques used by malicious websites. Adam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn, Brad Wardman, Kevin Tyers |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 2 |
| 2017 | Deep Android Malware DetectionabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel android malware detection system that uses a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). Malware classification is performed based on static analysis of the raw opcode sequence from a disassembled program. Features indicative of malware are automatically learned by the network from the raw opcode sequence thus removing the need for hand-engineered malware features. The training pipeline of our proposed system is much simpler than existing n-gram based malware detection methods, as the network is trained end-to-end to jointly learn appropriate features and to perform classification, thus removing the need to explicitly enumerate millions of n-grams during training. The network design also allows the use of long n-gram like features, not computationally feasible with existing methods. Once trained, the network can be efficiently executed on a GPU, allowing a very large number of files to be scanned quickly. Niall McLaughlin, Jesús Martínez del Rincón, Boojoong Kang, Suleiman Y. Yerima, Paul Miller 0003, Sakir Sezer, Yeganeh Safaei, Erik Trickel, Ziming Zhao 0001, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn |
CODASPY | 7 |