Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Suhas Vijaykumar
dblp:183/8660
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
potential outcomes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Localization, Convexity, and Star Aggregation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
improper learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Localization, Convexity, and Star Aggregation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds › rademacher complexity
offset rademacher complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Localization, Convexity, and Star Aggregation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Localization, Convexity, and Star Aggregation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix factorization · 0.7low-rank estimation · 0.7fourier analysis · 0.7self-concordance · 0.5convex empirical risk minimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial InterventionsabstractWe consider a setting where there are $N$ heterogeneous units and $p$ interventions. Our goal is to learn unit-specific potential outcomes for any combination of these $p$ interventions, i.e., $N \times 2^p$ causal parameters. Choosing a combination of interventions is a problem that naturally arises in a variety of applications such as factorial design experiments and recommendation engines (e.g., showing a set of movies that maximizes engagement for a given user). Running $N \times 2^p$ experiments to estimate the various parameters is likely expensive and/or infeasible as $N$ and $p$ grow. Further, with observational data there is likely confounding, i.e., whether or not a unit is seen under a combination is correlated with its potential outcome under that combination. We study this problem under a novel model that imposes latent structure across both units and combinations of interventions. Specifically, we assume latent similarity in potential outcomes across units (i.e., the matrix of potential outcomes is approximately rank $r$) and regularity in how combinations of interventions interact (i.e., the coefficients in the Fourier expansion of the potential outcomes is approximately $s$ sparse). We establish identification for all $N \times 2^p$ parameters despite unobserved confounding. We propose an estimation procedure, Synthetic Combinations, and establish finite-sample consistency under precise conditions on the observation pattern. We show that Synthetic Combinations is able to consistently estimate unit-specific potential outcomes given a total of $\text{poly}(r) \times \left( N + s^2p\right)$ observations. In comparison, previous methods that do not exploit structure across both units and combinations have poorer sample complexity scaling as $\min(N \times s^2p, \ \ r \times (N + 2^p))$. Abhineet Agarwal, Anish Agarwal, Suhas Vijaykumar |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Localization, Convexity, and Star AggregationabstractOffset Rademacher complexities have been shown to provide tight upper bounds for the square loss in a broad class of problems including improper statistical learning and online learning. We show that the offset complexity can be generalized to any loss that satisfies a certain general convexity condition. Further, we show that this condition is closely related to both exponential concavity and self-concordance, unifying apparently disparate results. By a novel geometric argument, many of our bounds translate to improper learning in a non-convex class with Audibert's star algorithm. Thus, the offset complexity provides a versatile analytic tool that covers both convex empirical risk minimization and improper learning under entropy conditions. Applying the method, we recover the optimal rates for proper and improper learning with the $p$-loss for $1 < p < \infty$, and show that improper variants of empirical risk minimization can attain fast rates for logistic regression and other generalized linear models. Suhas Vijaykumar |
NeurIPS | 1 |