Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rotem Tsabary

dblp:184/2550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 66% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 34%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
round complexity
0.922021
Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds · SIAM J. Comput. 2021
Degree 2 is Complete for the Round-Complexity of Malicious MPC · EUROCRYPT (2) 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.922021
Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds · SIAM J. Comput. 2021
Degree 2 is Complete for the Round-Complexity of Malicious MPC · EUROCRYPT (2) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
encryption
0.612022
Candidate Witness Encryption from Lattice Techniques · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption
witness encryption
0.612022
Candidate Witness Encryption from Lattice Techniques · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
perfect security
0.512021
Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds · SIAM J. Comput. 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure computation protocols › round complexity of secure computation
two-round protocols
0.512021
Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds · SIAM J. Comput. 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › functional encryption
attribute-based encryption
0.412019
Fully Secure Attribute-Based Encryption for t-CNF from LWE · CRYPTO (1) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors
0.412019
Fully Secure Attribute-Based Encryption for t-CNF from LWE · CRYPTO (1) 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
malicious security
0.412019
Degree 2 is Complete for the Round-Complexity of Malicious MPC · EUROCRYPT (2) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lattice techniques · 0.6multiparty randomized encoding · 0.5effective degree · 0.5black-box one-way function · 0.5secure multiparty computation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Candidate Witness Encryption from Lattice Techniques
Rotem Tsabary
CRYPTO (1)1
2021 Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds
abstract
We show that any multiparty functionality can be evaluated using a 2-round protocol with perfect correctness and perfect semihonest security, provided that the majority of parties are honest. This settles the round complexity of information-theoretic semihonest multiparty computation, resolving a longstanding open question [Y. Ishai and E. Kushilevitz, Randomizing polynomials: A new representation with applications to round-efficient secure computation, in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science FOCS 2000, IEEE Computer Society, 2000, pp. 294--304]. The protocol is efficient for ${NC}^1$ functionalities. Furthermore, given black-box access to a one-way function, the protocol can be made efficient for any polynomial functionality, at the cost of only guaranteeing computational security. Our results are based on a new notion of multiparty randomized encoding which extends and relaxes the standard notion of randomized encoding of functions [Y. Ishai and E. Kushilevitz, Randomizing polynomials: A new representation with applications to round-efficient secure computation, in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science FOCS 2000, IEEE Computer Society, 2000, pp. 294--304]. The property of a multiparty randomized encoding (MPRE) is that if the functionality $g$ is an encoding of the functionality $f$, then for any (permitted) coalition of players, their respective outputs and inputs in $g$ allow them to simulate their respective inputs and outputs in $f$, without learning anything else, including the other outputs of $f$. We further introduce a new notion of effective degree, and show that the round complexity of a functionality $f$ is characterized by the degree of its MPRE. We construct degree-2 MPREs for general functionalities in several settings under different assumptions, and use these constructions to obtain 2-round protocols. Our constructions also give rise to new protocols in the client-server model with optimal round complexity.
Benny Applebaum, Zvika Brakerski, Rotem Tsabary
SIAM J. Comput.3
2020 FHE-Based Bootstrapping of Designated-Prover NIZK
Zvika Brakerski, Sanjam Garg, Rotem Tsabary
TCC (1)3
2019 Fully Secure Attribute-Based Encryption for t-CNF from LWE
Rotem Tsabary
CRYPTO (1)1
2019 Degree 2 is Complete for the Round-Complexity of Malicious MPC
Benny Applebaum, Zvika Brakerski, Rotem Tsabary
EUROCRYPT (2)3
2018 Perfect Secure Computation in Two Rounds
Benny Applebaum, Zvika Brakerski, Rotem Tsabary
TCC (1)3
2017 Private Constrained PRFs (and More) from LWE
Zvika Brakerski, Rotem Tsabary, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Hoeteck Wee
TCC (1)2
2017 An Equivalence Between Attribute-Based Signatures and Homomorphic Signatures, and New Constructions for Both
Rotem Tsabary
TCC (2)1