Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiangyi Ye
dblp:184/3743
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
semantic similarity |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Effects of Creativity and Cluster Tightness on Short Text Clustering Performance · ACL (1) 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › text clustering
short text clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Effects of Creativity and Cluster Tightness on Short Text Clustering Performance · ACL (1) 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
text clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Effects of Creativity and Cluster Tightness on Short Text Clustering Performance · ACL (1) 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
k-means · 0.2graph-based clustering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Effects of Creativity and Cluster Tightness on Short Text Clustering PerformanceabstractProperties of corpora, such as the diversity of vocabulary and how tightly related texts cluster together, impact the best way to cluster short texts.We examine several such properties in a variety of corpora and track their effects on various combinations of similarity metrics and clustering algorithms.We show that semantic similarity metrics outperform traditional n-gram and dependency similarity metrics for kmeans clustering of a linguistically creative dataset, but do not help with less creative texts.Yet the choice of similarity metric interacts with the choice of clustering method.We find that graphbased clustering methods perform well on tightly clustered data but poorly on loosely clustered data.Semantic similarity metrics generate loosely clustered output even when applied to a tightly clustered dataset.Thus, the best performing clustering systems could not use semantic metrics. Catherine Finegan-Dollak, Reed Coke, Rui Zhang 0037, Xiangyi Ye, Dragomir R. Radev |
ACL (1) | 4 |